Waste Collection by a Recycling Centre (2011–2015)

The response reports useful opening and closing figures and the paper low in 2013, but its overview incorrectly describes the yearly totals as fluctuating only slightly. It also mislabels garden waste as plastic in 2011 and puts the labelled 2015 paper value above 70 tons. The 2013 exception to paper’s usual lead would sharpen the overview.

Ideas progress logically from an overview to detailed year-based descriptions, with cohesive devices such as 'meanwhile' and 'while' used naturally and without strain.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible for the task, with terms like 'fluctuated', 'hit the lowest point' and 'the opposite was true for', though occasional imprecise collocations such as figures 'witnessing' fluctuations appear.

The response uses subordinate clauses and a with-construction to combine figures, with generally controlled past-tense reporting. The existential wording in the 2011 tin sentence is cumbersome and could be made clearer with a direct passive construction.

The response gives a clear overview and reports accurate figures, including the 2013 exception for glass and the 2015 peaks. However, it adds unsupported detail about garden-waste composition, sometimes equates collection with recycling, and gives limited detail on the glass series.

Information is logically sequenced by category with effective linking devices and a sound paragraph structure, though progression within paragraphs is at times slightly mechanical.

Vocabulary is flexible enough for the task, with useful terms such as 'exceeded' and 'fluctuated'. Expressions such as 'gardening' for garden waste and 'the most amount' reduce precision, while 'tree clippings and shrubbery' introduces detail not supplied by the chart.

A good range of structures is used, including inversion ('Only in 2013 did the glass waste...') and relative clauses. Grammar is generally accurate, but the comparison of a total weight with 'types of recycling' needs parallel quantity phrasing.

The response covers all four categories with accurate selected figures and a supported overview of net increases and paper leading in most years. The ranking contrast for garden waste could be stated more precisely, and identifying the shared 2015 peak would strengthen feature selection.

Ideas progress logically from overview to category-by-category detail with effective linking devices and referencing, with only occasional mechanical comparisons.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, using varied phrases for trends such as 'gathering pace' and 'precipitous drop', with only slight awkwardness in expressions like 'enjoyed upswings regardless of categories'.

A wide range of complex structures, participle clauses and accurate tense use is handled with only rare, minor errors that do not impede meaning.