Reasons and Solutions for Buying Too Many Clothes

The response addresses both parts of the question with a relevant position and some supporting examples, though ideas are developed only partially and the conclusion is thin.

The essay is organised into logical paragraphs with basic cohesive devices, but progression is sometimes mechanical and some links between ideas are unclear.

Vocabulary is adequate for the topic with attempts at less common items, but misspellings and word-choice errors such as 'tendention', 'coping' and 'adviticements' recur and occasionally obscure meaning.

A mix of simple and complex structures is used with some flexibility, yet frequent errors in articles, prepositions and word forms reduce overall accuracy without fully blocking communication.

Both questions are answered with a clear position and relevant causes and solutions, supported by a specific example, though ideas are developed unevenly and the closing paragraph adds little substance.

Progression is broadly clear with paragraphing by task part and basic linkers, but some connectives are misused, such as 'Meanwhile' and 'However', and cohesion relies on simple sequencing.

Vocabulary is adequate for the topic with some appropriate items like 'stable income' and 'lifestyle', but word choice is sometimes imprecise, for example 'fabrics' for clothes and 'persons' for people.

A mix of simple and complex structures is attempted, but frequent errors in agreement, prepositions, and punctuation, such as 'it impact', 'before it get', and comma splices, occasionally reduce clarity.

Both questions are addressed with a relevant main reason and two solutions, but ideas and examples remain underdeveloped and are expressed with some inaccuracy.

The essay has a clear overall structure and uses basic cohesive devices, though progression within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical and links are loosely applied.

Vocabulary is adequate for the topic but limited, with noticeable errors in word choice and formation such as 'fationable attires', 'colth', and 'showoff people'.

A mix of simple and complex structures is attempted, but frequent errors in agreement, articles, and sentence construction reduce clarity at times.

The response addresses both parts of the task with a clear position and relevant main ideas, though the reasons and solutions are developed somewhat unevenly and lack extended support or examples.

Ideas are organised logically across clear paragraphs with effective use of cohesive devices, although some linking is mechanical and transitions between ideas occasionally feel abrupt.

There is a sufficient range of vocabulary for the topic, including items like seasonal sales, consumption, and ecosystem, with some unnatural collocations such as behaviour is developed and share their profiles that slightly reduce precision.

A mix of simple and complex sentence forms is used with generally good control and frequent error-free sentences, though occasional grammatical slips such as most of the people are convinced slightly weaken accuracy.

The response addresses both parts of the question with a clear position and relevant, mostly developed ideas, though some reasons and solutions remain thinly supported and narrow in scope.

Ideas progress logically across clear paragraphs with effective use of cohesive devices, with only occasional slightly mechanical linking between points.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise, showing good awareness of style and collocation, with only occasional less natural phrasing.

A variety of complex structures is used with generally good control, and errors are minor and non-impeding, apart from a slightly abrupt final sentence.

The response answers both questions with a clear purpose, develops each main idea with relevant explanation and examples, and reaches a clear conclusion, though some ideas remain slightly general.

Ideas are logically organised into clear paragraphs with coherent progression, although linking is at times mechanical and transitions occasionally feel abrupt.

The response uses an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, but frequent imprecise or awkward expressions such as 'high brand apparels', 'nature conservative groups', and 'effective causes' limit precision.

The response attempts a range of sentence structures, including extended explanations with subordinate clauses. Accuracy is uneven: article and plural errors recur, as in 'one of the most traded commodity', alongside incorrect preposition choices such as 'reasons on why' and 'aware on how'. The main ideas remain understandable.

Both questions are fully and directly addressed with a clear position, well-developed reasons, and a range of relevant, well-supported solutions.

Ideas progress logically across clearly sequenced paragraphs, with skilful referencing and cohesive devices that never feel mechanical.

Vocabulary is wide, precise, and natural, with idiomatic collocations such as price signal, capsule wardrobes, and social value used flexibly.

A wide range of complex structures is used with flexibility and accuracy, including well-controlled subordination and varied sentence patterns.