Benefits and Disadvantages of Nuclear Technology

The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace and nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Annotated response

10 correction notes

Showing 10 correction notes.

The debate on the use of nuclear power has persisted for many years. Although it has numerous advantages attached to it, we simply cannot write off its disadvantages. I strongly agree that the benefits it carries its drawbacks which will be discussed in this essay.

The arguments that the people table against nuclear weapons are mostly based on the threat to the world. These powerful weapons can an entire city in minutes if they are destructive hands. The most accurate example would be the two cities of Japan, namely Hiroshima and Nagasaki, destroyed during the . Moreover, these power plants may collapse if prone to natural disasters like earthquakes and . It eventually not only leads to the death of thousands of people by their , but it might also leave negative impacts on future generations.

Nevertheless, the are crucial to the world. The fact is that the world cannot be entirely dependent on intermittent power sources like wind and solar. Having said that. The primary advantages that nuclear technology possesses include zero carbon emission, . It is the cheapest source of energy which serves clean power needs. A single nuclear power plant can provide the energy required to run a whole city.

It is more reliable as it provides constant baseload power. It is worth mentioning here that it is way healthier when we compare it with its alternatives, coal and natural gas.

Therefore, I would like to conclude that despite some demerits of nuclear weapons and power, their advantages are . They should, however, be used with safety and precautions.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 6.5

The response presents a clear position with relevant examples such as Hiroshima and nuclear plant disasters, and its argument is generally easy to follow. The main limitation is the frequent confusion between nuclear weapons and nuclear power, which blurs the essay's focus, along with recurring grammatical slips that occasionally disrupt accuracy.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

6.0

The essay states a clear position and supports it with relevant examples, but it repeatedly conflates nuclear weapons with nuclear power plants, so the argument does not fully address the prompt as a coherent whole.

Coherence and Cohesion

6.5

Ideas are organised into logical paragraphs with a range of linking devices, though transitions such as 'Having said that.' are misused and the progression within paragraphs is occasionally mechanical.

Lexical Resource

6.5

Vocabulary is adequate for the task with some appropriate terms like 'baseload power' and 'zero carbon emission', but imprecise usage such as 'huge than', 'enumerable', and 'healthier' as a noun limits precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

6.0

A mix of simple and complex structures is attempted, but frequent errors, including 'the threat it present', 'if they are destructive hands', and sentence fragments, reduce accuracy without obscuring the core message.