Why People Travel More and Its Benefits

The response addresses both questions with a clear position and relevant examples, but the ideas are limited in depth and the reasoning, such as waiting on a flight building personality, is sometimes underdeveloped or unconvincing.

Progression is broadly clear with paragraphing that separates reason, benefits, and conclusion, but cohesion is mechanical, information is repeatedly restated, and the conclusion merely duplicates earlier wording.

There is adequate range of vocabulary with some less common items like phenomenal and mesmerizing, though errors such as ammused, main reason of, and unnatural collocations reduce precision.

A mix of simple and complex sentence forms is used with some accuracy, but errors in punctuation after linking phrases, articles, and clause construction are noticeable yet rarely impede meaning.

The response addresses both parts of the question with a clear purpose, well-developed main ideas, and relevant supporting examples throughout.

Progression is generally logical with clear paragraphing, though some linking is mechanical and a comparative clause is joined awkwardly with conflicting connectives.

There is a sufficient range of topic-related vocabulary, but some expressions are imprecise or unnatural, such as 'stress relaxation' and 'various culture'.

A variety of complex structures is used with reasonable accuracy, but frequent minor errors in articles, agreement, and sentence construction remain.

The response addresses both questions fully, maintains a clear position, and supports main ideas with relevant explanation and concrete examples.

Ideas progress logically across well-organised paragraphs with clear linking devices, though a few mechanical punctuation slips occur, such as a comma before 'Firstly'.

Vocabulary is generally adequate for the task with some good collocations, but imprecise items like 'commuting', 'adds upon knowledge', and 'vast cultures' limit precision.

A range of complex structures, including relative clauses and conditionals, is used with flexibility, alongside occasional errors in articles and agreement that do not impede meaning.

Both questions are fully addressed with a clear, consistent position, relevant main ideas, and well-developed supporting examples throughout.

Ideas progress logically within clear paragraphs, with cohesive devices such as 'That is to say', 'As a result', and 'Furthermore' used naturally to link points.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and mostly precise, including phrases like 'massive price reduction' and 'enlarge their social circle', with only occasional awkwardness such as 'can expose to'.

A variety of complex structures is used with good flexibility, but recurring errors such as 'many new travel transportation companies exist now' and faulty agreement reduce accuracy to a good but imperfect level.

The response addresses both questions directly, maintains a clear position throughout, and develops each main idea with relevant explanation and a concrete example.

Ideas progress logically across well-organized paragraphs with a range of cohesive devices used naturally, with only occasionally mechanical linking.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and mostly precise for the topic, though some collocations like 'more economic' are slightly awkward.

A variety of complex structures is used with good control, but several noticeable errors, including missing subjects and agreement slips, recur without obscuring meaning.