Sample response & feedback

Sharing Information in Research and Business

Question

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Annotated response

11 correction notes

Showing 11 correction notes.

The debate surrounding the free dissemination of information, especially in scientific and academic circles, is a complex one. While some argue that knowledge should be guarded for its commercial or security value, I believe that sharing information as broadly as possible yields far more benefits than drawbacks.

To begin with, making information accessible can greatly aid progress in various fields. Open data allows researchers, students, and innovators from across the globe to contribute to solving world problems, irrespective of their . For instance, owing to freely shared medical data, researchers in less affluent countries were able to develop affordable diagnostics during health crises. This culture of openness also enables faster problem-solving and the reaping of collective benefits.

Admittedly, there are concerns about intellectual property and security. Companies spend millions developing strategies and products, so it is only natural they protect their investments. However, can often hinder cooperation and slow down breakthroughs that could benefit society at large. The fear that shared knowledge would be misused is, in many cases, unfounded. Legal frameworks and ethical guidelines can address these issues without obstructing the flow of information.

In summary, while acknowledging the importance of protecting valuable data in some scenarios, I strongly support the idea that information, particularly in science and education, should be shared widely. After all, knowledge multiplies when shared.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.0

The response presents a clear position, addresses both views, and supports ideas with relevant examples and language that is precise and natural. Organisation and grammatical range are strong throughout. The main limitation is the under-length response, which slightly limits the depth of development expected at this level.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

TR Task Response

6.5

Both views are discussed and a clear personal position is developed with relevant supporting examples, though the response falls short of the minimum length, limiting full development.

CC Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Ideas are logically organised with clear progression, cohesive devices are used naturally, and each paragraph manages a distinct stage of the argument effectively.

LR Lexical Resource

7.0

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, with natural collocations such as 'free dissemination' and 'hindering cooperation', showing good awareness of style and academic tone.

GRA Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

A wide range of structures, including complex sentences and subordinate clauses, is used with flexibility and generally strong accuracy, with errors rare and non-impeding.