We now live in an age where information is a valuable commodity and can drive progress. However, there is some debate over how much of that information should be shared freely. There are several arguments in favour of the idea that as much knowledge as possible should be shared, and in fact in some domains it is essential. Academic progress is underpinned by the ability to peer-review new research and theories, and similarly, in scientific research, collaboration between different scientists is often essential in making new breakthroughs. The development of the Internet, for example, was only made possible by openly sharing its architecture so that everyone could use it. There are also arguments in favour of sharing certain types of business information, such as management methods and findings related to employee performance, as these might help to improve a country’s economic competitiveness. However, there must be limits as to what can be shared. It would be absurd for companies to share their financial accounts openly as this would make it easy for their rivals to compete unfairly, and a lot of personal information should be similarly protected. And while sharing new findings can be useful, it is important to understand that at considerable expense in terms of time and money. There would be less incentive to develop intellectual property like new technologies and new drugs for everyone to duplicate. Therefore there needs to be a balance between sharing and protecting information. Some types of information can, and must, be shared freely, but not when it would discourage the creation of that information.
Sample response & feedback
Sharing Information in Research and Business
Question
Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Annotated response
10 correction notes
Overall assessment
Why this response received Band 7.5
The response addresses all parts of the task, discussing both views with relevant, well-chosen examples and reaching a clear, nuanced position. Its strongest aspect is the coherent, logical progression of ideas supported by precise vocabulary, while the main limitation is that the second view could be developed in slightly more depth.
IELTS criteria
How each score was decided
TR Task Response
7.5Both views are addressed with relevant, developed ideas and a clear, balanced personal opinion, though support for the restricting view is somewhat thinner than for sharing.
CC Coherence and Cohesion
7.5Ideas progress logically through the debate, benefits, limits and conclusion, with generally natural linking. The lengthy sentence combining peer review and scientific collaboration could separate those mechanisms more clearly.
LR Lexical Resource
7.5Vocabulary is precise and flexible, featuring natural collocations like 'underpinned by', 'economic competitiveness' and 'incentive to develop intellectual property'.
GRA Grammatical Range and Accuracy
8.0A wide range of structures, including complex conditionals and relative clauses, is used with strong control and only rare minor slips.