Due to the rapid development of our society, humankind can now get access to new applications. However, there is still to pay for their higher studies to keep up with these changes. It is argued that we ourselves can all pursue tertiary education or even be entitled to university without any fee, no matter how wealthy or poor we are. While this thinking is valid to an extent, I believe that the governments should not waive the tuition because this will lead to . There are many compelling reasons why some think that the provision of free-of-charge education should be allowed in universities. Standing a chance to keep pursuing higher education, the bachelor's degree holders, especially those who could not afford the tuition, have more opportunities to land a high-paid job and bettering their quality of life. However, . If there are more and more , this will lead to a large number of the unemployed, which would cause a wealth of serious consequences. , I would contend that is not likely a smart decision for both students and society. On the individual level, not having to cover the tuition fee would have a bad effect on students themselves. , the majority of students must pay their tuition fees in order to attend college, so they will . Hence, waiving tuition, in some cases, does not put a strain on them to keep going. Therefore students' academic performance . With an influx of poor-quality graduates, society might not push it to the limit. Taking everything into consideration, while waiving tuition makes it seem like a good idea, I believe that this will cost a high price for global development.
Sample response & feedback
Free University Education for All Students
Question
Some People Think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that the Government should make it free for all students no matter what financial Backgroud They have. to extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
Annotated response
19 correction notes
Overall assessment
Why this response received Band 6.0
The response presents a clear disagreement with free university education and organises it into conventional paragraphs, which is its strongest aspect. The main limitation is that several ideas are imprecisely expressed and underdeveloped, with word-choice errors that occasionally obscure meaning.
IELTS criteria
How each score was decided
TR Task Response
6.0The response addresses the question with a clear position against free tuition, but the main arguments are unevenly developed and some claims remain vague or unsupported.
CC Coherence and Cohesion
6.0Progression is broadly clear across paragraphs with some cohesive devices, though referencing and connections are occasionally mechanical or unclear.
LR Lexical Resource
6.0There is a reasonable attempt at less common vocabulary, but noticeable inaccuracies such as 'exquisite the tertiary degree' and 'push it to the limit' reduce precision.
GRA Grammatical Range and Accuracy
6.0A mix of sentence structures is used with generally clear meaning, but frequent errors in verb forms and phrasing, such as 'bettering their quality of life', persist throughout.