Some People Think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that the Government should make it free for all students no matter what financial Backgroud They have. to extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
It is argued that all and sundry should have access to get a tertiary education, and the government must make it free for all irrespective of their financial status. I completely agree with the statement because literacy is the great panacea, a cure for all ills, and it is mostly sought for the development of a country.
First off, it is ever said that education is the panacea for all social evils. To elaborate, people believe in superstitions, and the contribution of the researchers is immense in liberating people from the shackles of false notions. For example, if students get themselves enrolled in higher degree programmes, then they will spend many years as a historian or a researcher to ascertain the underlying causes of this misconception. Then they will be able to make their society understand, and the society will become a better place to live in. Moreover, people do not prefer to visit physicians and instead, they rely on false beliefs and let the situation worsen. So, it can be said that education can emancipate humankind from these notions that are not beneficial for humanity.
Furthermore, having literate people in any nation means a country can progress by leaps and bounds. To exemplify it, if students are given an opportunity to get a tertiary education, then after completing it, they will be able to get handsome income and can be positioned at respective jobs, namely planners, social workers, who with their knowledge can give a new shape to their nation. So, if citizens are employed at higher positions by considering their qualifications, then they will maintain a healthy living standard, and a country will automatically lead on the path of progress. Thus, the government needs to provide free education to all if it believes in transformation.
To conclude, I believe getting a university education is a basic right of all the people as literacy can remove all evils and helps in maintaining positive outlook of people who enrolled in master degree programmes and do research and transform their society into a good one.
Due to the rapid development of our society, humankind can now get access to new applications. However, there is still an influx of people who could not afford to pay for their higher studies to keep up with these changes. It is argued that we ourselves can all pursue tertiary education or even be entitled to university without any fee, no matter how wealthy or poor we are. While this thinking is valid to an extent, I believe that the governments should not waive the tuition because this will lead to an explosion of numerous dangers.
There are many compelling reasons why some think that the provision of free-of-charge education should be allowed in universities. Standing a chance to keep pursuing higher education, the bachelor's degree holders, especially those who could not afford the tuition, have more opportunities to land a high-paid job and bettering their quality of life. However, these thoughts seem not always true. If there are more and more people exquisite the tertiary degree, this will lead to a large number of the unemployed, which would cause a wealth of serious consequences.
As aforementioned drawbacks, I would contend that publishing a free-college policy is not likely a smart decision for both students and society. On the individual level, not having to cover the tuition fee would have a bad effect on students themselves. As usual, the majority of students must pay their tuition fees in order to attend college, so they will make an effort in absorbing information. Hence, waiving tuition, in some cases, does not put a strain on them to keep going. Therefore students' academic performance goes down in an easy way. With an influx of poor-quality graduates, society might not push it to the limit.
Taking everything into consideration, while waiving tuition makes it seem like a good idea, I believe that this will cost a high price for global development.
Education is a very important part of everyone’s life. Nowadays it is essential for everyone to get good and high education to become successful in life. Some people think that all people have the right to get a free University education and their financial background doesn’t matter for their study . In my honest opinion, I agree with this statement to a larger extent, and in some further, in further paragraphs, I will Express my opinion with logical facts and points.
First of all, good and quality higher education is the basic need of every people. After completing school, higher education, like University education, played a very significant role to make a successful career. Many people are not able to get this education because of some financial problem, and for that reason, they can’t get high-paid jobs . University education should make free of costs for everyone by the government so people can easily study without any hesitation And worry about fish while studying. So they can easily concentrate on their study and become successful in their life. As an epitome of me, so many Western countries and Arab countries such as Germany, Europe, Dubai, Israel already made University education free for the people of their country; because of that, the earning ratio of people of that country is higher than others.
Moreover, if the person gets higher University education and they get a high paid job, which is good for both country and the person, For example, the person gets a job in a multinational company, so it increases the economy of the country by spending money in their own country, and it fills up the cost of their free education which was given by the government as well, and a person can also happily live their life by earning handsome money.
On the other hand, giving free education to everyone is hard for the government. It takes lots of money to make University education free, of course for everyone, and it’s not possible for some poor countries such as Uganda, Zimbabwe. Moreover, if students get free education, then they can’t study in a good manner, and they don’t take education as serious.
In the end, I would like to conclude by saying that University education plays a major role in one’s life, and government should take the step to make University education free for everyone.
Education is the basic right of every human being. Education creates empowerment and makes the people capable of earning their bread and butter. Today we will discuss the importance of education and government policies that shall mandate its access to each human being. As we say that education is priceless, I agree that education up to the university level shall be freely available irrespective of caste, creed and financial status of the family.
To begin with, education is the paramount need of every human being. It evolves the person and provides knowledge to synchronize with changing world and lifestyle. The percentage of educated people in a country decides its global position in the list of powerful nations. Education brings innovation, which eventually drives the growth of the country and attracts foreign investment. Availability of Education shall be ensured by the government in all cities and far-flung areas. In fact, it shall be freely accessible by all people up to the university level without any discrimination and limitation.
Further to add above, education enables a person to know their rights, which makes them smart enough to get fooled, especially in the modern era, where the world is rapidly changing, and technology has infiltrated so much in people’s personal life. It provides them with enough understanding to make the right selection when required in cases such as voting for government positions. Uneducated people are the prey of politicians and can be fooled easily by them. Uneducated people can be easily divided in the name of caste and religion, which is not good for any country. An educated person understands the motive behind these tactics and stays away from all these tantrums.
To conclude this, I strongly agree that access to education up to the university level shall be provided free to ensure prosperity and development of the nation and society.
Many today would argue that higher education is a basic right that should extend to all, regardless of socioeconomic background. In my opinion, I largely disagree since there is more value in improving the relationships between social classes.
Supporters of this policy point out that every taxpayer is entitled to equal treatment. Those who are wealthy typically receive little financial support from the government unless if they have earned a prestigious scholarship. However, such families pay taxes at far higher rates than the average citizen. They have contributed greatly to the federal budget and it is only just that they should receive an equal allocation of their share of government disbursement for university. Without financial aid, these individuals may feel they are being unfairly treated simply because they are more successful.
Although I recognize the legitimate merits to the argument above, I would generally side with those who believe a system that takes into account financial differences is more sustainable. If average families are not allocated the majority of funding for higher education, then they may not be able to attend these schools at all. This risk does not exist for the more affluent. Over time, this could have dire ramifications on society. The general populace might feel that upward social mobility is nearly impossible and become demotivated. They may also begin to resent the government and higher classes, creating the conditions for social unrest.
In conclusion, despite calls for fairness under the law, certain distinctions should be made for the betterment of society on the whole. Government policy should be aimed at equality of opportunity rather than a reductive understanding of equality.
The right to access university education is a contentious issue, with some believing that the government should make it free for all students. Despite the supporting argument, I am inclined to disagree with this opinion, as this course of action has negative implications .
It is understandable that some people support free university education. The primary reason is that students would be provided with equal opportunities, with those from lower-income households being less disadvantaged in particular. Students who are normally burdened by tuition fees would be relieved of their predicament , allowing them to fully devote themselves to the pursuit of knowledge. Furthermore, such a policy can be the precursor to a highly-educated population. Thanks to universalized tertiary education, more people can become academic experts, enhancing the level of discourse in society. It would, therefore, seem that making university education free of charge is a worthwhile goal .
This policy, however, is far from ideal . There would be a new financial burden on the public, since universities require additional funding to teach expanding student cohorts that inevitably result. Taxpayers would be disaffected if their hard-earned money is used to support groups of people whose material contribution to society is deemed nebulous . Another point less talked about is the reduced academic freedom in higher education. Universities which submit to this government policy to receive funding would be significantly influenced by what the bureaucrats decide they could teach. The consequences of this are less manifest in the short term, but eventually, a large part of society will have matured thinking the same way, reducing the diversity of opinion. Based on these points, it could be argued that tertiary education wholly funded by the public is more disadvantageous than it is beneficial.
In conclusion, I believe university education should not be free for all. As well-meaning as this course of action may sound, it would be an inefficient use of resources and not without pitfalls . There can be other measures to improve the level of knowledge among the populace while still leaving the government unburdened.
A cost that is difficult for a person or group to pay.
From the essay
There would be a new financial burden on the public, since universities require additional funding to teach expanding student cohorts that inevitably result.
People living together whose combined earnings are lower than those of other households.
From the essay
The primary reason is that students would be provided with equal opportunities, with those from lower-income households being less disadvantaged in particular.
