Some people believe the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between poor people and rich people. Others think it is having an opposite effect. Discuss both of these points of view. What is your opinion on that issue?
There has been ubiquitous distension of technology in modern times, and it has been profusely scaling up the rungs incessantly. The breakthrough has modified the lives of people to a much larger extent. Where some standpoints say that it has magnified the lacuna in the economic dynamic of people, others argue that it has mitigated the polarity of social status. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall be discussing both the views and my notion in this regard.
There are certain people who claim that the gap between the socio-economic class has been increased in terms of luxuries of life. Certain technologies have created disparity and boldened the boundary drawn between the extreme classes. Not only do those technologies provide the wealthy and well off strata a shimmer of opulence, but they also play havoc with the aspirations of the frugal middle class. This view might blend in with the thought processes of some people who might deem it excruciating.
On the other hand, some people enlighten the essence of technology in alleviating the abyss between the extreme layers. I side with this notion as it has paved a way for the deprived column of people to be benefitted in a gigantic capacity. Education, which once was not able to be provided and imparted to some section due to unaffordability of the physical institutions are now relayed to everyone regardless of economic status with a minimal expenditure. Moreover, the skills and courses that one has to look around for in some premier coaching institutes and institutional setup, are now very reasonably priced in the online medium that could be opted for by many. Even in the case of women who couldn’t go out to work due to a plethora of restrictions are now very much employed in the wake of work from home because of the sudden surge of technologies. This would, in turn, sum up in bolstering the weaker economic lot.
Hence, in conclusion, it could be argued that technology has been a benediction to humanity and a major factor in the drifting of all the sections equally and indistinctively. It has indeed bridged the gap between the rich and the poor.
Estimated band6.5
7.0
7.0
6.0
6.0
Response 02
360 words
Today, modernization has revolutionised humans’ lifestyles fundamentally. Industrialisation has made our world a better place for living, although some individuals believe that this has been more useful to more affluent citizens. From my perspective, these advancements have led all humans to live better, even the deprived ones.
On the one hand, those who believe that by the development of technology, the rich have gained more beneficiaries have their own reasons. One is that luxury lifestyle has become more popular globally. The more luxury goods are produced by different companies, the more well-to-do citizens have more choices to purchase more variety of magnificent items. For instance, in 2015, Apple, a well-known electronic corporation in the USA, has produced a new version of Apple cell phone as size as a watch with the price of over $20000. Therefore, this watch will be affordable to those having tremendous saving. In addition, in trading, richer countries have a better access to the latest technology of e-commerce, while the poor ones, higher expenditure avoids them to compete with the former and the globalisation has increased the gap between the developed and underdeveloped nations.
On the other hand, I personally agree with those believing that modernization has had more positive influences on both rich and poor people. One important impact is that all nations have a better access to more highly developed health system. For example, even in remote areas of Africa, MRI is used for diagnosing of diseases, and its technology can be compared to the one which is being used in the USA. In addition, travelling facilities have been altered dramatically. Had not aviation technology been developed so fast, less general people would have used low-cost airlines. In the past, only the rich could pay the ticket of an airplane, but now even a simple worker and his family can afford the fee of a flight annually.
In conclusion, some may believe that the more the technology develops, the more wealthy citizens have better living conditions. However, I personally agree that this can influence the level of accessing to medical services and travelling facilities, and the poor’s lifestyles have been and will be improved far significantly.
Estimated band6.5
5.0
6.0
7.0
7.0
Response 03
175 words
Technology seems to promise infinite benefits for mankind. While it could be argued that the development of new technology always expands the gap between rich and poor, it is also true that the level of technology used in developing countries and low-income countries has been quicker than the developed countries over the last few years and this has helped to bridge the gap between the rich and the poor. So, both views have some ground which I shall be discussing in this essay.
There are many reasons why people say that technology increases the gap between rich and poor. To begin with, new technology itself tends to be affordable by only the richer elements of society and the poorer elements are denied the opportunities that this provides, such as the ability to be able to train for better paid work. It is understandable that because of their ability to acquire new technology, the learning ability within the richer elements of society is much improved. Therefore they get better job placements and continue to grow further.
Estimated band7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
Response 04
262 words
Some people say that the availability of technology is widening the gap between the rich and the poor, while other people think it is closing the gap. Personally, I believe that the availability of technology has little to do with the gap between the rich and the poor.
On one hand, having access to the latest and most advanced technology could bring a number of financial benefits to people. Advancements in technology have brought about large changes in the way people work and do business, and more specifically, in the efficiency of most workplaces. Technology has enhanced the productivity of most businesses around the world, particularly in manufacturing processes, and this has consequently boosted the profits of many companies, and therefore possibly made many wealthy businessmen even richer, thereby increasing the wealth gap.
However, with an increase in the availability of many new technologies, it is also becoming more affordable for the large majority of people, which has provided more equal opportunities between people, whether rich or poor. For example, the internet has become extremely widespread throughout the world these days and has provided people of all financial status access to a great deal of information that they can use to their advantage to help them educate themselves in order to live better lives, and therefore potentially decrease the gap.
In conclusion, I do not believe that access to technology really has much impact on the gap between rich and poor people. It is education and the acquisition and application of knowledge that may affect the wealth gap between rich and poor.
Estimated band7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
6.5
Response 05
337 words
There have always been considerable discussions in terms of the influence of technology on human beings. It is argued by some that the advent of technology is responsible for expanding the gap between social classes, I believe that technology is an ideal vehicle for people to get closer to each other.
On the one hand, I understand why some people think that technological devices increase the gap between rich and poor people. They argue that technological advances have led to the appearance of various luxurious products which are so costly that only the rich in the society are able to afford. Take supercars as a typical example, these cars are often equipped with upper-level performance engines and other state-of-the-art equipment. Also, they must under rigorous safety tests before delivering to customers, and therefore they are too expensive in the market. It is impossible for poor people who live on a small salary to buy this kind of cars which may cost them a fortune but many rich people buy exorbitant cars to separate them from their society.
On the other hand, I believe that there do exist many technological inventions which reduce the differences between wealthy and poor people. The advancement of technology has brought many opportunities for most people from a variety of backgrounds to approach a range of technological products which are affordable in the market. It is exemplified by a high proportion of families in Vietnam who use air conditioners and washing machines on a daily basis. In the past, it was difficult for impoverished people to possess these products which are limited in numbers and expensive. However, not only well-off households in cities but also rural families in the countryside can buy them to improve their living standards as they are not only diverse in size and quantity but also cheap.
In conclusion, there are some high-tech devices which are prohibitively expensive for poor people, but I believe that many low-cost technological products help to reduce the gap between rich and poor people.
Estimated band7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
Response 06
293 words
It is true that the advent of technology has brought tremendous benefits to human life. While technology can narrow the gap between social classes to some extent, I believe that some technological products have set affluent individuals apart from others , as will now be discussed.
On the one hand, it is true that technology has transformed our lives and reduced the gap between individuals. The availability of technological products has allowed massive numbers of people to live a comfortable life in almost the same way. For example, today, nearly every household has at least a television, a fridge, or an air-conditioner, all of which help increase the overall standard of living and narrow the gap between the haves and the have-nots in society. The spectacular growth of low-cost airlines also means that more people can take a flight to the place they want to go to.
Looking at the argument in this light, some feel that technology has bridged the gap between the rich and the poor . On the other hand, I side with those who argue that some technology has separated wealthy individuals from poorer ones. Many technological products are prohibitively expensive , and only the rich are able to afford them. Luxury cars and private jets, for instance, have created a shining image for the owners, giving them an aura of confidence when they appear in public. Those who live on a meager income , in contrast, could merely enjoy a frugal life with mediocre but necessary consumer products. The idea of possessing the latest technology in the home might be far-fetched to bourgeois individuals.
In conclusion, although some technological products are produced for the masses, I believe that some others contribute to the difference in lifestyles between rich people and poor ones.
In conclusion, there are some high-tech devices which are prohibitively expensive for poor people, but I believe that many low-cost technological products help to reduce the gap between rich and poor people.
The level of comfort people have through money, goods and services.
From the essay
For example, today, nearly every household has at least a television, a fridge, or an air-conditioner, all of which help increase the overall standard of living and narrow the gap between the haves and the have-nots in society.
Increased how much work is done for the time and effort used.
From the essay
Technology has enhanced the productivity of most businesses around the world, particularly in manufacturing processes, and this has consequently boosted the profits of many companies, and therefore possibly made many wealthy businessmen even richer, thereby increasing the wealth gap.
