It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct. There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One of the most commonly-heard arguments ever is that humans should not intervene in the potential extinction of certain species of animals, which is considered natural. This assumption is far from convincing.
On the one hand, some people might think that humans should not seek to create any interventions. This is based on the belief that animal extinction is a natural phenomenon as a result of such disasters as forest fires, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, tsunamis, floods, droughts, and so on.
On the other hand, what I strongly believe is that it is a must to make efforts to prevent animals from dying out, especially when it comes to endangered animals including the rhino and the tiger, for two major reasons.
Firstly, poaching, or illegal hunting, is a man-made problem which is on the rise around the globe, specifically in third-world countries. For a wide variety of purposes ranging from recreational to medicinal factors, rhinos and tigers have been hunted to such an extent that their populations have seriously shrunk in recent years. Without aggressive global interventions, future generations would only see them in encyclopedias, as is the case of dinosaurs. Secondly, it is human beings that are destroying animals’ natural habitats so as to do business earning as much money as possible.
One of the striking examples is an increasing number of luxurious resorts coming into being are associated with this issue. If governments had no measures to tackle it, it would inevitably place all species, humans included, on the verge of extermination.
In conclusion, it is definitely unreasonable to believe there should be no action taken as far as the future disappearance of certain animal species is concerned.
It is sometimes argued that animal extinction is a natural process which should not be intervened in by humans. I largely agree with this argument given the importance of the process and the urge to address more urgent issues even though the disappearance of species might lead to serious harm to the ecosystem.
The foremost rationale for my disapproval of human intervention lies in the crucial role of extinction in natural selection. Specially, the selection process , one of the fundamental laws of nature, ensures that species incapable of acclimatizing to environmental changes are eliminated to allow for more suitable species to survive. If humans interfered with the elimination of some species, this fundamental principle as well as the normal development of the natural world would be seriously disrupted.
Another reason as for why I oppose the endeavour of halting animal extinction is the presence of more pressing challenges. Notably, there exist a number of perennial problems , including environmental pollution, international conflicts and overpopulation, which might not only downgrade people’s living standards but also threaten the existence of mankind . Consequently, allocating resources to tackle these urgent problems takes precedence over preserving certain animal species.
Nevertheless, I acknowledge the potential degradation of the ecosystem associated with the extinction of animal species. If one or more animal species are lost forever, this would disrupt the food chain as other animals would lose important sources of food. This could lead to a chain reaction of other animals and by extension the breakdown of the wider ecosystem, threatening both global food security and human habitats.
In conclusion, I mostly endorse the opposition to human protection of animal species from extinction considering its importance in natural selection and the significance of solving more immediate problems despite the possible loss in biodiversity. That is why governments should halt all related projects and redirect their resources to more important ones.
Some people advocate that there is no need for human intervention to prevent the inherent and inevitable process of natural extinction of animal pieces. In this essay, I will challenge this school of thought, on grounds of human responsibility for mainly causing such occurrences, and the adverse impacts of animal extinction on human life, ecosystem and scientific advances.
Firstly, activities carried out by humans are the main culprit behind the unprecedented rate of species extinction today. These activities, including habitat destruction, pollution, climate change, and overexploitation of natural resources, pose serious threats to the destruction of once unspoiled animals’ habit, and accordingly the survival of hundreds of valuable species of fauna. In fact, there is a general consensus that extinction induced by humans occurs at a significantly faster rate than natural extinctions. Given this, it is argued that ethical and moral obligations compel humans to take urgent measures to prevent extinction due to their major role in accelerating the process.
Secondly, animals can have a noticeable influence on human life. Indeed, humans have an inextricable relationship with wildlife, which means that the extinction of a wild animal could seriously threaten the survival of mankind. Coral reefs, for instance, are incredibly diverse ecosystems that support numerous marine species and provide livelihoods for millions of people through tourism and fisheries. The extinction of coral species due to factors like climate change and pollution can lead to the collapse of entire reef ecosystems, impacting both marine biodiversity and the livelihoods of coastal communities. This is a testament to how investing in the protection of a wild animal is synonymous with safeguarding and enhancing the existence of humans.
Lastly, the loss of animal species could detrimentally affect the ecosystem and thus hinder progress in the field of science. Ecosystems comprise a complex web of interdependencies among species, with each species having a unique and important role to play. As a result, when one species is lost forever, these intricate relationships are damaged, leading to disrupted food chains and ultimately a decline in biodiversity. Moreover, there is no doubt that besides allowing better chances to withstand and recover from environmental changes, maintaining biodiversity, or in other words, diverse ecosystems, is fundamental to scientific advancements, including the discovery of new medicines and treatments that would tremendously improve our quality of life.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that it is of great importance for humans to take actions in order to slow down the extinction rate of animal species, otherwise the implications for overall human life are too overwhelming.
Animals belonging to species that may disappear completely.
From the essay
On the other hand, what I strongly believe is that it is a must to make efforts to prevent animals from dying out, especially when it comes to endangered animals including the rhino and the tiger, for two major reasons.
