International Sports Events: Unity or Competition

Both views are addressed and a position is stated, but ideas are developed in a generalised, repetitive way and the opinion about economic benefit only loosely connects to the question of friendship between countries.

There is a logical overall progression with paragraphing and linking devices, but cohesion is partly mechanical through formulaic connectors, and some referencing and idea links are unclear.

A sufficient range of vocabulary is demonstrated, but meaning is obscured at points by awkward collocations and imprecise phrases such as 'save their relationship by not including the event's results in their bucket list'.

A mix of simple and complex sentence forms is used with reasonable frequency, though recurring errors in article use, verb choice, and clause construction are noticeable without usually blocking meaning.

Both views are addressed and a preference for the benefits of these events is stated, but enjoyment is not clearly linked to international friendship. Support is unevenly developed, and the response is below the minimum length.

Progression is broadly clear with a view-by-view structure and basic linkers, though some connections are mechanical or faulty, such as 'Not only, the individuals but...'.

Word choice is adequate for the topic with some attempt at topic-specific terms, but frequent misspellings like 'physcoligical', 'celerbrete' and 'memoialbe' reduce precision.

A mix of simple and complex structures is attempted, but recurring errors such as 'this lead', 'other believe' and 'despite of the competition' show limited grammatical control.

The response addresses both views and gives a clear, consistent opinion, but some ideas, such as learning about other nations' policies, are underdeveloped and supported only in general terms.

The argument progresses logically with appropriate linking devices and paragraphing, though a one-sentence paragraph and occasionally mechanical connectors slightly weaken cohesion.

There is a sufficient range of topic-related vocabulary such as cultural exchange and diplomatic relationship, but awkward collocations like expose them with multiple language reduce precision.

A mix of simple and complex structures is used with generally clear meaning, yet frequent errors in agreement, tense, and article use, such as if they organised and ruins atmosphere, show imperfect control.