Recent exam · 7 Oct 2026Recycled · 2023More recent exam questions

Free Freshwater Use vs Government Control

Some people think that people should be given the right to use freshwater as they like. Others believe governments should strictly control the use of freshwater.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

1 sample answer, estimated Band 7.0. Your turn?

Write it first, then read the sample answers and reviews below. You'll see the gap at once.

  • Question ready
  • 40-minute exam timer
  • Results in about 20 seconds
  • 1 free preview a week

From essays on this question

Essay ideas: Free Freshwater Use vs Government Control

WhyThis is aDiscussion essay — it asks you to discuss two opposing views and give your own.

SoWe split the ideas intoFirst view(supports the first view)andSecond view(supports the second view).

First view

2 ideas

Second view

2 ideas

Same question · Different responses

Sample responses and feedback

Response 01

Must fixSuggested

Essay · 285 words · 1 paragraph · 13 comments

Score details

Response 01
Estimated band7.0/ 9

Overall assessment

The essay presents a clear preference for government control and offers relevant ideas about unequal access and recreational consumption. However, the opposing view is discussed mainly in terms of free provision and increased supply rather than freedom to use unlimited amounts. Explaining that distinction and showing how regulation would address the problems would strengthen the argument. The language is generally controlled, although some expressions and references lack precision.

TR

Task Response

A clear preference for government control is maintained, with relevant ideas about unequal access and recreational use. However, the opposing view shifts towards free provision and increased supply rather than unrestricted consumption, and the benefits of regulation need fuller explanation.

7.0
CC

Coherence and Cohesion

The discussion moves logically from the two views to a consistent conclusion, using clear transitions. References such as “the first assertion” and “a contributing factor” could be more explicit, and the rainwater point needs a clearer link to the argument it supports.

7.0
LR

Lexical Resource

The essay uses a varied topic vocabulary, but expressions such as “pure water amenities” and “the proper direction” lack precision. “Leaving the poor in the lurch” is a correctly formed idiom, although a more specific description would clarify the access problem.

6.0
GRA

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

A range of complex sentences is used with generally good grammatical control. “I would discuss” makes the intended essay plan sound hypothetical; a direct present-tense thesis would be clearer. “No price for using it” is awkward wording rather than a grammatical error.

7.0

What to work on next

Explain why supporters oppose limits on water use, rather than just charges. Link rainwater collection to that position, then show how one proposed government control could reduce excessive consumption or improve access.

From essays on this question

Useful vocabulary: Free Freshwater Use vs Government Control

Practise this question

Write your response

Task 2 question loaded.
Part 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write at least 250 words.

Words: 040:00 starts on first word