Feedback Letter to a Removal Company

The letter covers all three required points with relevant detail and a suitable register, though some phrasing is imprecise and the closing detail about the discount slightly stretches the purpose.

Ideas are organised into clear paragraphs with a logical progression, but cohesive devices are sometimes mechanically or inaccurately used, as in the sentence openers 'However,' and 'Although,'.

Vocabulary is generally adequate for the communicative task, with some appropriate expressions, but word-choice errors such as 'thank you too all employee', 'few area', and 'movement went easily' reduce precision.

A mix of simple and complex sentence forms is attempted, but frequent errors in agreement, articles, and verb forms such as 'which need extra care' and 'everything goes smooth' limit overall accuracy.

All three prompt bullets are addressed with a suitable tone and a clear purpose, but the praise for the employee is underdeveloped since no name or specific helpful actions are given, limiting full coverage.

The letter is logically organised into paragraphs with clear progression and appropriate cohesive devices, showing generally smooth information flow.

There is adequate range of vocabulary for the purpose, though some imprecise or unnatural choices, such as 'this phenomenon' and 'a bit inconvenience', reduce precision.

The letter uses relative clauses and a conditional request to communicate a clear account of the move. The noun phrase 'a bit inconvenience' is grammatically incomplete. However, the plural verb 'do not match' agrees correctly with the two coordinated subjects, the agreed price and the written fee.

The response covers all three prompt bullets with clear purpose, suitable formal register, and convincing detail, though the complaint about the booking system is developed only briefly.

Ideas progress logically through the three bullet points with varied cohesive devices, though a few connectives such as 'And here' feel mechanical and the praising paragraph merges two ideas.

Vocabulary is generally adequate and sometimes precise ('carefulness', 'high professionalism'), but occasional awkward or inaccurate choices like 'requisted' and 'not willingly helpful' limit flexibility.

A range of structures is attempted, including relative clauses, but frequent errors such as 'my furniture... contain', lowercase 'i', and comma misuse show only partial control of accuracy.

All three bullet points are fully addressed with well-developed, relevant detail, an appropriately courteous tone, and a clear communicative purpose, with only minor lapses in register.

Ideas are logically sequenced across the three points, and cohesive devices are used flexibly to guide the reader smoothly through the letter.

Vocabulary is generally flexible and precise for the context, though occasional imprecise items such as 'costumers', 'overlooked', and 'transition to my new home' reduce accuracy.

A good range of structures is used with generally strong control, but minor errors such as 'prevented my possessions from getting scratched on' and 'sticks to its high standards' are noticeable.