Young People Volunteering in Poorer Countries

More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work, such as teaching and building houses for communities in poorer countries. What are the reasons for this? Who benefits more from this, the communities or these young people?

Annotated response

1 correction note

Showing 1 correction note.

A growing number of young people from wealthy nations are spending brief periods volunteering in developing countries, engaging in activities like teaching and community building. This essay will examine the reasons behind this trend and argue that the young individuals themselves benefit more than the communities they serve.

Several factors contribute to this increasing trend. Firstly, globalization has made travel more accessible, and many youths are eager to explore the world and make a difference. Secondly, there is rising awareness about global inequality and a desire among youth to contribute positively. Finally, educational institutions often encourage volunteer work as part of personal development, and such experiences add value to college and job applications.

While the local communities receive help in the form of manpower and resources, the long-term benefits for them may be limited due to the short duration of these projects. In contrast, young volunteers often return home with new perspectives, greater maturity, and improved communication and problem-solving skills. These personal and professional gains are long-lasting and frequently transformative, indicating that the volunteers benefit more in the long run.

To conclude, the trend of short-term volunteer work among youth from developed countries is driven by both altruism and self-development goals. While communities receive short-term help, it is ultimately the young people who gain the most from these enriching experiences.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.0

The response's strongest aspect is its clear, well-structured argument that directly answers both questions with a firm position and logical paragraphing. The main limitation is its under-length response, which leaves the reasons and the benefit comparison somewhat thinly developed despite fluent, accurate language throughout.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

6.5

Both parts of the task are addressed with a clear, consistent position that volunteers benefit more, but the response is 30 words below the minimum length and its ideas are developed only at a sufficient rather than extended level.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Paragraphing is logical and cohesive devices such as firstly, secondly, and in contrast are used naturally, producing clear progression throughout the essay.

Lexical Resource

7.0

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, with apt phrases like global inequality, manpower and resources, and transformative, allowing ideas to be conveyed clearly with only routine wording.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

A wide range of structures, including complex contrastive and subordinate sentences, is used with good control and only minor, non-impeding lapses.