Young People Volunteering in Poorer Countries

More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work, such as teaching and building houses for communities in poorer countries. What are the reasons for this? Who benefits more from this, the communities or these young people?

Annotated response

1 correction note

Showing 1 correction note.

In recent years, many young individuals from affluent countries have chosen to engage in short-term unpaid work in underprivileged nations, including teaching or helping with construction. This essay will explore the reasons behind this trend and argue that, although both sides benefit, the young volunteers gain more from the experience.

One key reason for this trend is the growing popularity of voluntourism , where young people combine travel with volunteer work. This allows them to experience new cultures while also contributing to meaningful causes. Additionally, many universities and employers now value international volunteering as a way to demonstrate leadership, social responsibility, and adaptability. These motivations drive students and recent graduates to participate in short-term volunteer projects abroad.

Although the host communities do benefit from this assistance—through improved infrastructure or educational support—the young volunteers arguably gain more. These experiences help them develop crucial life skills, broaden their worldviews, and build their resumes. Furthermore, exposure to different cultures and socio-economic challenges often makes them more empathetic and socially aware individuals. In contrast, the help given to local communities is often temporary and limited in impact.

In conclusion, while the communities in poorer countries certainly gain some benefits from the contributions of young foreign volunteers, it is the young people themselves who benefit more in terms of personal growth and future opportunities.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.0

The response presents a clear position on who benefits more and develops the causes of the trend with relevant, coherent explanation. Its main limitation is the under-length response of 220 words, which restricts the depth of development despite otherwise mature language and organisation.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

6.5

The response addresses both questions with a clear position and relevant ideas, but the response falls 30 words short of the minimum length and development remains somewhat general.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Paragraphing is logical, progression is clear, and cohesive devices such as 'additionally' and 'in contrast' are used naturally throughout.

Lexical Resource

7.0

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, with terms like 'voluntourism', 'socio-economic challenges', and 'empathetic' used appropriately to convey nuanced meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

A wide range of sentence structures is used with good control, including complex constructions and effective contrastive clauses, with only minor slips such as the misplaced space before a comma.