Staying with One Organisation vs Changing Jobs

Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Annotated response

1 correction note

Showing 1 correction note.

There are people who believe that one should work for different employers throughout their careers since this practice would expose the workers to a wide range of opportunities and challenges. People on the opposite end of this argument choose to be loyal to a single organisation, citing stability and emotional satisfaction. I think that the latter is the better option. Experiencing different work cultures can help a person be a better problem solver, possibly leading to unique career opportunities. Assuming different companies may have different approaches to the same problem, a worker who masters multiple approaches would prove that they highly sought-after qualities such as adaptability and problem-solving skills. Such workers are likely to be sought after by different organisations and offered promotions as well as lucrative contracts. In reality, the CEOs of some of the largest corporations can often be former CEOs of lesser-known businesses who were recognized for their achievements and subsequently invited to work for these giants. People who spend their career working for one organisation, on the other hand, are often able to take advantage of their familiarity with the working conditions and the perks that come with their seniority. Having worked in the same environment throughout their career, they may not need to readjust to any new working cultures. This could also allow them to have intimate operational knowledge of their organisations, thus making them irreplaceable after a certain amount of time. Most successful businesses also value loyal workers and reward them with seniority-based bonuses. The key difference which makes staying with the same organisation a superior choice to job hopping is job satisfaction and emotional stability. Because of the disproportion between the number of workers and desirable positions, it could be assumed that most people would never reach their dream job. This could potentially cause emotional distress, feelings of inadequacy and disappointment to the vast numbers of workers. In conclusion, while working for various organisations may provide some chances of an extraordinary career, the odds of being left disappointed and emotionally depleted loom over the workers. I think that stability and subsequent emotional satisfaction is what makes a career desirable and enjoyable.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.0

The response presents a clear position, covers both views with relevant development and a plausible corporate example, and maintains logical progression throughout. The main limitation is occasional imprecision in word choice and some overloaded sentences that slightly reduce clarity in places.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

7.0

The response addresses both views, states a clear personal position, and supports it with developed ideas and a relevant example, with only minor unevenness in depth.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Ideas progress logically across well-managed paragraphs with varied cohesive devices, though some links and pronoun references occasionally feel mechanical.

Lexical Resource

7.0

Vocabulary is reasonably flexible and topical, but occasional imprecise collocations such as 'process highly sought-after qualities' reduce precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

A range of complex structures is used with good control, though some very long sentences show strain and minor awkwardness in construction.