In the past, people used to work for the same company all their lives. In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of people who prefer to work for a variety of companies. This essay will show that despite there being many financial benefits to having a one-company career, it is better to switch workplaces regularly in order to fully develop. On the one hand, those who believe that having the same job throughout their lives argue that it gives them financial stability. Long term employees normally accrue financial rewards such as a higher salary and a decent pension plan. For instance, long-term employees of the UK government can normally retire when they are 55 with 75% of their final salary paid to them each month until they die. However, having the same job for life does not suit everyone and could of stagnation. People working for a variety of companies are given more opportunities to learn different skills. When workers start a new job, they will be exposed to new co-workers and a different corporate culture that shows them how to do things differently. For example, Wired Magazine recently reported that the average Apple employee only works there for 5 years and the average Google worker is there for less than 2 for this very reason. In conclusion, while working for the same company all our lives can provide financial security, this essay believes that it is better to work for different companies in order to grow and become better than before.
Staying with One Organisation vs Changing Jobs
Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Annotated response
3 correction notes
Overall assessment
Why this response received Band 7.0
The response addresses both views and presents a clear opinion, with logical paragraphing and relevant if slightly underdeveloped examples. The strongest aspect is the controlled, flexible language, while the main limitation is the thin development of the second view and a small number of imprecise phrases.
IELTS criteria
How each score was decided
Task Response
7.0Both views are discussed and a clear position is maintained throughout, though the second side receives less development than the first.
Coherence and Cohesion
7.0Progression is logical with effective paragraphing and cohesive devices, although transitions are at times mechanical.
Lexical Resource
7.0There is a good range of topic-appropriate vocabulary with occasional imprecision such as 'could leave to certain level of stagnation'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
7.0A variety of complex structures is used with generally good control and only occasional errors affecting accuracy.