Global Business and Cultural Contact vs National Identity

Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is positive development, while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Annotated response

1 correction note

Showing 1 correction note.

Some opine that the increasing trade and cultural relations between nations bring about numerous positive effects, fostering global cooperation and economic growth, while others argue that this interconnectedness may lead to the erosion of national identities, traditions, and cultural uniqueness. In my view, while the benefits of international contact are undeniable, it is essential to strike a balance that preserves and respects the diverse cultural heritage of smaller nations.

On the one hand, proponents of the benefits of increasing business and cultural contact between countries assert that it promotes understanding and collaboration among nations. Enhanced trade relations facilitate the exchange of goods, services, and technologies, boosting economic prosperity for all involved. For instance, the ease of cross-border communication and cooperation has allowed companies to expand their markets globally, leading to economic advancement and job opportunities. Furthermore, cultural exchange programmes and international events encourage the appreciation of diverse traditions, fostering mutual respect and harmony among nations.

Conversely, intensified cultural and business ties may lead to a homogenization of cultures, overshadowing the uniqueness of smaller nations. The influence of global media and mass communication can perpetuate dominant cultures, diluting local traditions and identities. For example, the prevalence of Westernized fashion and entertainment may overshadow traditional clothing and indigenous art forms, leading to a loss of cultural identity for smaller communities.

In conclusion, growing business and cultural contact between nations undoubtedly brings substantial benefits, promoting mutual understanding, economic growth, and global cooperation. However, we must also be mindful of its potential impact on smaller nations' national identities and cultural diversity. While international trade facilities and agreements should be welcomed, necessary efforts to preserve cultural and national identities should also be made.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.0

The response fully addresses both views and states a clear personal position, with well-organised paragraphs and a good range of vocabulary. Its main limitation is that the supporting ideas remain somewhat general and predictable, and occasional grammatical slips reduce precision.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

7.0

Both perspectives are addressed with relevant explanation and examples, and a clear position is presented and sustained in the conclusion, though the ideas are developed in a fairly general rather than deeply extended way.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

The essay is logically organised with clear paragraphing, appropriate linking devices, and coherent progression throughout, although cohesion is at times somewhat formulaic.

Lexical Resource

7.0

There is a good range of vocabulary with some flexibility and less common items such as homogenization and erosion of national identities, with only occasional imprecision like trade facilities.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

A variety of complex structures is used with generally good control and frequent error-free sentences. There is an error in "some concerns that", which lacks the intended verb construction; most other clauses, including the final sentence, are grammatically complete.