Coffee and Tea Habits in Five Australian Cities

The response covers all three habits in all five cities with an accurate overview highlighting the cafe trend and Adelaide's exception, and the reported figures match the chart closely.

Progression is logical with a clear overview, sequenced groupings, and effective referencing devices, though some body paragraphs read as somewhat mechanical city-by-city listing.

Vocabulary is flexible and mostly precise, including useful comparisons such as "by a slight margin" and "nearly level". However, "most characteristic of" is vague for reporting a proportion, and "stocking up on" implies buying a supply that the survey does not establish.

A wide range of structures is used with strong accuracy, including complex comparative and appositive constructions, with only very minor awkwardness such as 'bought more instant coffee by a slight margin (50%)'.

The response covers all cities and categories with a clear overview and relevant comparisons. Brisbane’s café figure is understated at roughly 51% rather than around 55%, while some category descriptions and close comparisons could be expressed more precisely.

Ideas progress logically through an overview and city groupings with effective use of referencing and cohesive devices like 'Meanwhile' and 'Moving on to'.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, with natural phrases such as 'marginally higher', 'most prevalent behaviour', and 'nearly identical'.

Sentence structures are varied and controlled, including accurate comparative and relative constructions with only rare minor slips such as 'At the same period'.