英国2001年至2008年每日果蔬摄入量

The response covers all three groups across the period, gives a clear overview of rising trends with women consistently highest, and data figures are broadly consistent with the chart, with only minor imprecision in describing the men's change.

Ideas are logically organised with clear paragraphing, an overview, and cohesive devices such as 'Similarly' and 'On the other hand', though a few linkages are mechanical or informal.

Vocabulary is generally flexible and appropriate for describing trends, including 'proportion', 'dietary guideline', and 'gradual increase', but phrases like 'Anyways' and 'lesser change in the amount' reduce precision.

A range of structures is attempted, but errors including the missing verb in 'women who the mentioned proportions' and tense inconsistencies lower accuracy despite mostly clear meaning.

The response covers all three groups and provides an overview of the rise and later decline. It correctly identifies women as having the smallest net increase. However, it wrongly places men at about 12% in the early years; their level is about 17.5%.

Ideas progress logically from an overview to group-by-group detail, with cohesive devices such as 'Similarly' and 'On the other hand' used naturally, though the opening of paragraph three partially repeats the overview.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible for the task, with terms like 'notable increase', 'steadily peaked', and 'gradual decline', though some phrasing such as 'the mentioned diet' and 'this kind of food consumption' is imprecise.

A good range of structures is used with generally accurate control, including varied tense forms, participial phrases like 'before declining to 30%', and complex sentences, with only minor awkwardness such as 'rose from 12% ... and reached up to 27%'.