With the development of technology, it is now more feasible for people to study the history of their ancestors. There are several rationales that encourage modern citizens to conduct this research. In my perspective, I assume that this may be a breakthrough movement of human beings to identify their roots which would be exemplified with some lucid examples during the course of this essay. , tracing back the history of an important family can aid descendants in understanding thoroughly their ancestors as well as locate distant relatives. For instance, studying the bloodline may not only assist historians in identifying more information on the history of their countries but also help royal members locate their distant . This would be particularly useful in countries with much turmoil in their recent history. Additionally, for ordinary yet extended families with hundreds of members, family tree research may be necessary in order to create a helpful graph that enables younger generations to recognise their forebears and roots. Nevertheless, because not everyone can afford it, it is not always feasible for regular citizens to carry out this kind of research. In reality, conducting this kind of study sometimes necessitates spending a sizable sum of money to employ expert researchers and historical specialists. Additionally, it frequently requires a lot of time and resources, and few families have the patience to wait for the outcomes. Additionally, not every outcome can benefit a family and might have an impact on a person’s life. For example, in cases of having , an individual could become more timid when mentioning their family heritage. In conclusion, while I reckon that understanding a family’s history could provide essential knowledge that helps youngsters fully comprehend their ancestry, it is also important to take into account the obstacles that this might .
Researching Family History and Genealogy
In some parts of the world, it is becoming increasingly popular to try to find out the history of someone’s family. Why do you think people do this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Annotated response
4 correction notes
Overall assessment
Why this response received Band 6.5
The strongest aspect is the response's reasonably wide vocabulary and generally controlled sentence structures, which keep the message clear throughout. The main limitation is that the answer to the two-part question is uneven: the reasons for researching family history are only partly developed, and the positive-versus-negative judgement becomes hedged after promising a clearly positive stance.
IELTS criteria
How each score was decided
Task Response
6.0The response addresses both parts and states a position, but the reasons for the trend are unevenly developed and the promised positive stance is weakened by the negative second body paragraph and a hedged conclusion.
Coherence and Cohesion
6.5Progression is broadly clear with logical paragraphing, though cohesion devices are at times mechanical, with 'Additionally' repeated across consecutive sentences.
Lexical Resource
7.0A sufficient range of vocabulary is used with some flexibility and less common items such as 'bloodline', 'forebears', and 'necessitates', despite occasional awkward collocations like 'breakthrough movement'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
7.0A variety of complex structures is used with generally good control, and errors such as 'a notorious great grandparents' are minor and rarely impede communication.