Some individuals argue that movies should exist primarily to entertain audiences. set of people think that movies should be only for educational purposes . However, this essay will discuss both sides with relevant examples.
On one side, people tend to believe that films are a form of escapism and that they offer the viewers a chance to relax and forget their daily worries. From this perspective, movies serve a similar function to other leisure activities, just like sports or music. If films focus too much on education or moral lessons, they may become less interesting and fail to attract viewers. For example, films, like action blockbusters or comedy movies, often become successful and have a good reach among the people as they spark happiness, eagerness, and emotional release, which many people seek at the end of a hectic day.
On the other hand, many individuals and education counsellors believe that movies should also carry a good amount of educational value. have the power to reach thousands of people and raise awareness about trending issues. For example, historical movies can teach people about important events, while documentaries can , environmental, or even social topics. In this way, the field of cinema can serve as a tool for learning that is both engaging and also impactful.
In my opinion, the most effective films can ideally combine entertainment with education. A purely entertaining movie may be enjoyable in that particular moment but it may not leave a lasting impression. Conversely, a film with only educational content can feel heavy and struggle to sustain the interest of the audience. Hence, when filmmakers blend compelling storytelling along with meaningful information, they not only impress the viewers but also it encourages them to reflect on what they have watched.
To conclude, while some people believe films should focus only on entertainment and others think that education should be present in the movies, I believe that both handled in a balance is the key to an impactful output.