Increase in Global Flights and Air Travel Taxation

The world has seen an enormous increase in flights for leisure, business and commercial purposes around the world over recent years. What do you think are the main advantages and disadvantages of such flights? Do you think flights should be taxed more?

Annotated response

1 correction note

Showing 1 correction note.

The world has seen a significant rise in flights for leisure, business, and commercial purposes in recent years. This increase has brought several advantages, but it has also created notable disadvantages. In my opinion, while air travel is beneficial for global development, higher taxation on flights may be necessary to reduce environmental damage.

One major advantage of increased air travel is economic growth. Tourism generates employment opportunities in airlines, hotels, and local businesses, especially in developing countries. In addition, business and commercial flights make international trade faster and more efficient, allowing companies to expand globally. From my own experience, affordable flights have allowed me to travel abroad for holidays, gaining cultural exposure and new perspectives.

However, the disadvantages are equally serious. The most significant problem is environmental pollution. Aircraft produce large amounts of carbon emissions, which contribute to climate change. Moreover, popular tourist destinations often suffer from overcrowding, leading to noise pollution and damage to local ecosystems. Airports also place pressure on nearby communities due to traffic and noise.

I believe flights should be taxed more, particularly for leisure travel. Higher taxes could discourage unnecessary flights and encourage people to choose greener transport options when possible. Additionally, the revenue collected could be invested in environmental protection or the development of sustainable aviation fuel.

In conclusion, although increased air travel supports economic growth and connectivity, it also harms the environment. Therefore, reasonable flight taxes are justified to balance development with sustainability.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.5

The response is well organised and clearly answers both parts of the question, with a consistent position supporting higher flight taxes and relevant supporting detail. Its main limitation is that development remains somewhat general and example-driven, and the response falls ten words short of the required length.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

7.5

Both questions are addressed with a clear position and relevant, if not deeply extended, support, though the response is slightly under the 250-word minimum.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Ideas progress logically across well-managed paragraphs with effective use of cohesive devices, though linking is occasionally mechanical.

Lexical Resource

7.0

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and topic-appropriate, with some precise collocations such as 'carbon emissions' and 'sustainable aviation fuel', but range is not consistently sophisticated.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.5

A variety of complex structures is used with good control and only minor, non-impeding errors.