Protecting natural resources is a big responsibility of every citizen in the country, but some people do not care and would like to by exploiting resources in their vicinity . For instance, deforestation, which is exercised immensely to avail maximum financial benefits and to fulfil people demands of modern furniture has dire consequences and could lead to other severe problems. There is a dire among people about the use of natural resources and government must support that as much as possible. It is clear that use of natural resources has dramatically increased over the last few years. The primary reason for this approach is to earn money by using all the means, for example, developers are removing large numbers of trees to acquire vacant lands so that they can build new apartments and shopping malls that would provide them lofty profits. Excessive use of resources such as lack of fresh and clean air, increased pollution and global warming. A government should adopt pragmatic approaches to . There should be attempts by the government to educate people about effective and efficient uses of resources. There is so that people refrain from activities that could harm the environment. To sum up, I would like to say that and will substantially help in saving resources. It is also to to protect the environment. Mutual efforts by the government and individuals of a country would .
Sample response & feedback
Government Action Against Overusing Natural Resources
Question
The overuse of natural resources causes an ultimate exhaust of them. People have been using them to be in the swim of new styles such as making new furniture of recent design. This causes a huge harm to the environment. Therefore, the government should discourage people the overuse of these resources. To what extent do you support or oppose the idea?
Annotated response
18 correction notes
Overall assessment
Why this response received Band 6.5
The response's strongest aspect is its clear, consistent support for government action, supported with relevant examples such as deforestation and urban development. The main limitation is uneven idea development and some repetitive, imprecise phrasing, which keeps the argument from reaching full depth despite generally clear meaning.
IELTS criteria
How each score was decided
TR Task Response
6.5The position of supporting government discouragement of overuse is clear, relevant examples like deforestation and property development are provided, and the conclusion answers the question, though some ideas remain underdeveloped and the framing of individual versus government duty is only briefly addressed.
CC Coherence and Cohesion
6.0Ideas progress broadly logically from problem to causes to solutions, but cohesion is at times mechanical, with repeated linking devices and some abrupt shifts between sentences that reduce the flow of the argument.
LR Lexical Resource
6.5There is sufficient topic vocabulary, including “exploiting”, “legislation” and “detrimental”. However, repeated use of “dire” and awkward combinations such as “take financial benefits”, “disseminating awareness” and “environment safety” reduce precision.
GRA Grammatical Range and Accuracy
6.5The response uses simple and complex structures with generally clear meaning. Errors include the missing possessive in “people demands”, a missing closing comma in the deforestation relative clause, and missing determiners or plural forms in “individual’s duty” and “preemptive measure”.