Advertising Products as New: Causes and Effects

In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Annotated response

2 correction notes

Showing 2 correction notes.

It is common these days for businesses to heavily promote the new and unique features of their products in advertising campaigns. The aim is to stand out from fierce competition and boost sales. While this strategy has some merits, I believe emphasising product newness is largely a negative trend.

The primary motivation for companies to advertise their goods as novel is to increase profits in a crowded market. Brands want to create positive impressions amongst consumers and make them feel their upgraded product is a must-have purchase. For example, shampoo and soap ads often proclaim new ingredients, vitamins or scents compared to previous versions. However, these so-called innovations are usually minor or exaggerated, intended to drive sales through marketing rather than genuine product improvements.

may contend that this approach generates enthusiasm amongst consumers to sample updated offerings from trusted companies. However, the problem is that genuine innovation requires substantial research and development efforts, rather than just creative advertising promoting new products encourage a wasteful mindset of regularly replacing functional items with slightly changed ones. It also takes away resources from companies that could be used for significant advancements that would genuinely improve consumers’ lives.

In conclusion, while businesses aim to attract buyers through novel product claims, this advertising emphasis fuels unnecessary consumption and superficial product tweaks rather than real R&D. For the benefit of society, companies should focus less on claimed newness and more on meaningful innovations that address people’s needs. Moderation in messaging would help balance profits with responsible practices and sustainability.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.0

The strongest aspect is the clear, consistent position supported by relevant examples and a logical two-part structure that answers both questions. The main limitation is slightly thin development of the counterargument and a few mechanical slips that keep the language short of fully flexible control.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

7.0

The response addresses both questions directly with a clear negative position, well-developed main ideas and relevant examples, though the opposing view is somewhat briefly treated.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Ideas progress logically across clear paragraphs with effective cohesive devices, with only occasional mechanical flaws such as a missing space after a full stop.

Lexical Resource

7.0

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, including items like 'fierce competition', 'superficial product tweaks' and 'wasteful mindset', with only minor slips in word choice and formatting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

A range of complex structures is used with generally good control, including concessive clauses and relative constructions, though small errors such as capitalisation mid-paragraph appear.