Police Budget Sources and Spending in Britain

The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Cambridge IELTS 17 Academic Test 2 Writing Task 1 visual

Annotated response

6 correction notes

Showing 6 correction notes.

The table and pie charts provide information about the 2017-18 police budget of one area of Britain. The sources of the budget’s funds are shown in the table, and the charts illustrate how the money was used.

Overall, the budget for the police , with the national government providing the majority of the funding in both years. Meanwhile, salaries continued to be the main form of spending.

Initially, the police department’s overall budget was £304.7 million in 2017, and it increased significantly to £318.6 million in 2018. With an increment from £175.5 million to £177.8 million, the national government provided the majority of this money. Local taxes showed the strongest growth of all revenue sources, from £91.2 million to £102.3 million, while other sources made up £38.5 million of the overall budget in 2018, a raise of over the prior year.

Moving to the pie charts, officer and employee salaries made up the majority of dropped from 75% to 69%. The amount spent on technology, nevertheless, from 8% to 14%, while the amount spent on stayed constant at 17%.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.0

The response covers all sources and spending categories with mostly accurate data and a clear overview, showing strong control of language and structure. The main limitations are a few imprecise word choices and small data slips, such as quoting a dollar figure and describing other sources with only the 2018 value.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Achievement

7.0

The response covers all key features of both the table and the pie charts with a clear overview and relevant comparisons, though a few details are slightly inaccurate or incomplete, such as writing $0.5 million instead of £0.5 million and giving the 2018 figure only for other sources.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Ideas are organised logically into overview, sources, and spending, with cohesive devices used naturally, although the comma splice before 'however' and occasional slightly misused connectors show less than full flexibility.

Lexical Resource

7.0

Vocabulary is flexible and mostly precise for describing budgets and trends, but slips such as 'the budget thrived' and 'nearly increased' reduce precision below a higher band.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

A wide range of structures is used with generally good control, including complex sentences and accurate tense use, with only minor punctuation and cohesion errors that do not impede meaning.