身兼多职的原因及利弊

Advantages and disadvantages are fully addressed with clear, developed ideas, but the explicit question about reasons for the trend is not answered as a distinct part of the task, leaving coverage uneven.

The response is logically organised with clear paragraphing, effective linking devices, and a coherent progression from benefits to drawbacks to conclusion.

Vocabulary is flexible and largely precise, with natural collocations such as 'make ends meet', 'safety net', and 'burnout', though some phrasing is slightly formulaic.

A wide range of sentence structures is used with good control, and errors are minor and non-impeding, such as the slightly redundant 'feelings of isolation, and stress'.

The advantages and disadvantages are clearly addressed and developed, but the first question about reasons is only briefly touched on in the opening paragraph rather than answered and extended, leaving part of the task unevenly covered.

Ideas progress logically through clear paragraphs with effective linking devices, and the conclusion follows coherently from the discussion.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, with natural collocations such as income streams, spreading yourself too thin, and burnout, showing good awareness of style.

A wide range of sentence structures is used accurately, with strong complex constructions and only rare, minor errors that do not impede communication.

All parts of the task are addressed with a clear position and relevant main ideas, though the reasons are developed more briefly and generally than the advantages and disadvantages.

Ideas progress logically across well-managed paragraphs with a range of cohesive devices used naturally, with only occasional slightly formulaic linking.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, with natural collocations such as 'financial stability', 'come at a steep price' and 'burnout', showing strong awareness of style and only rare inaccuracies.

A wide range of complex structures is used with good flexibility and control, and errors are rare and non-impeding.

Both questions are addressed with relevant reasons and a clear assessment of benefits and costs. The baker example supports the benefits, although several claims about platforms, employer responsibility and workers’ preferences need qualification or fuller explanation.

Ideas progress logically across well-managed paragraphs with a wide range of cohesive devices used naturally and unobtrusively.

Vocabulary is flexible and often effective, including 'kept pace with', 'builds a buffer' and 'compound quietly'. A few expressions are less natural or precise, particularly 'widen skills' and 'single employment', but the argument remains clear.

A wide range of structures is handled confidently, including relative clauses, subordination, coordinated clauses and parallel verb phrases. Grammatical control is sustained across the essay, although the long sentence listing personal disadvantages could be easier to process.

The response fully addresses both questions, presents a clear position, and develops each main idea with relevant explanation and example, with only modest depth of extension.

Ideas progress logically across well-managed paragraphs with effective cohesive devices, though the sequencing and linking are at times somewhat mechanical.

Vocabulary is precise and flexible, using topic-appropriate items such as gig economy, income streams, and burnout naturally with minimal inaccuracy.

A wide range of structures is used flexibly and accurately, including complex sentences and clear referencing, with only rare minor slips.