1993年与2003年欧盟进口服装每公里平均价格

The response covers all six countries and includes an overview, but confuses lower prices within 1993 with decreases over time. Its 2003 account misstates the overall direction of change and reverses the relative prices of Japan and India. The overview also incorrectly presents Japan as low-priced relative to the other suppliers.

Information is arranged in logical year-based paragraphs with a clear overview and linking devices, though connectors like 'Whereas' are used mechanically and slightly inappropriately at times.

There is adequate vocabulary for describing prices, but choices such as “appropriately” instead of “approximately” and “goods which is being brought” instead of imported clothing reduce accuracy. “Increased by” also confuses final price levels with amounts of change.

A mix of simple and complex structures is attempted, but errors in tense consistency, subject-verb agreement and relative clauses are noticeable, although the intended meaning generally remains clear.

The response addresses the task with mostly accurate figures for all six countries in both years, but the overview is vague and slightly misleading, describing countries as fluctuating when the chart shows clear directional changes, and it repeatedly calls clothing fabric.

Information is grouped logically by rising, falling, and stable prices with appropriate linking devices, though some connections and phrasing remain mechanical or imprecise.

Vocabulary is generally adequate, and less common trend language is attempted. However, “escalated” assigns unsupported agency to countries, “levelled off” implies a preceding movement, and “fabric” repeatedly substitutes a different product for clothing.

A mix of structures is attempted, but verb-form errors such as “prices are declined” and the faulty construction “cost fabric for” reduce accuracy. The figures remain understandable, although some sentences attach comparisons and references awkwardly.

The response covers all six countries across both years, identifying the highest and lowest prices with mostly accurate figures. However, it infers an absence of fluctuations from Brazil’s equal endpoints and adds an unsupported explanation about market advancement.

Information is arranged logically by country and progression is broadly clear, but cohesive devices are sometimes mechanical or misused, as with 'Besides' and 'Last but not least'.

Vocabulary is generally adequate for the task with some topic-appropriate items like 'slight decline' and 'fluctuations', but awkward or inaccurate phrasing such as 'least price exporting' and 'is with the least price' limits flexibility.

A range of structures is attempted, but errors are frequent, including subject-verb agreement mistakes ('The years under consideration is'), tense inconsistencies, and faulty comparisons, though meaning remains mostly clear.

The response covers all six countries and identifies most rankings and changes correctly, including the unchanged Brazilian price. However, the comparison of Bangladesh with Japan is inaccurate: about £3 is one fifth of £15, rather than “almost three times less”. The overview could bring together the contrasting trends more clearly.

Information moves logically from 1993 price rankings to changes by 2003, but the entire report is in one paragraph. Separating the introduction and overview from the two detail stages would make that progression clearer. Some references, including “their rate”, also lack precision.

Vocabulary is generally adequate for describing prices and trends, but recurring inaccuracies such as 'costume' for clothing, 'six different years', and 'rate it gave' reduce precision.

A mix of structures including comparative and passive forms is attempted, but frequent article, preposition, and agreement errors ('paid than that of', 'per kilometre clothing import') are noticeable although meaning remains mostly clear.

The response covers all six countries and accurately identifies the highest and lowest prices in both years. Most figures are well supported, but India’s rise from about £7 to £12 is incorrectly described as a doubling. References to kilograms and to EU exports also conflict with the chart’s unit and trade direction.

Information follows a clear sequence from higher-priced to lower-priced suppliers, with comparisons across the two years. However, all the information is presented in one paragraph. Separating the overview and grouping the country details would make the structure easier to follow.

The lexical range is adequate for describing prices and trends, but noticeable inaccuracies like 'premier price', 'kilo costume', and 'one-kilometre dress' reduce precision.

A range of simple and complex structures is attempted, but awkward noun phrases, incomplete clause structure and faulty comparison forms reduce control. Examples include “prices of per kilometre clothing”, “with that of 2003”, and the Brazil sentence’s opening without a finite verb.

The response covers all six countries and identifies the highest and lowest prices. However, it wrongly places Brazil in the declining group, describes India and Bangladesh as spending on imports, and uses “by” for their 2003 price endpoints, materially overstating their increases.

Information is logically grouped by rising and falling trends with a range of cohesive devices, although some linkers like 'Essentially' are used unnaturally.

There is an attempt at less common vocabulary, but items such as 'paramount in cost', 'minuscule', and 'tantamount' are inappropriate in context, reducing precision.

A variety of complex structures is used with generally good control, and errors such as the lowercase 'china' and a comma splice before 'however' are minor and non-impeding.

The response covers all six countries with figures consistent with the plotted bars, provides a clear overview of the highest and lowest prices and the main increases, and makes relevant comparisons. However, the economic-development classification is not supplied by the chart, and including the two decreases in the overview would make the summary fuller.

Ideas are logically organised with clear paragraphing, effective cohesive devices such as 'by contrast' and 'on the other hand', and progression that is easy to follow throughout.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible for the task, with good use of terms like 'surged', 'declined modestly', and 'remained stable', though some phrasing shows slight repetition of price-change language.

A wide range of structures is used with strong control, including relative clauses, participial phrases and complex sentences. The reference to a price figure as the most expensive source is imprecise, and making the import price the subject of India’s increase would clarify what is rising.