Team Sports vs Individual Sports

Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Annotated response

9 correction notes

Showing 9 correction notes.

While some say that participating in team sports is advantageous, others think that players will reap more benefits from individual sports. that team sports can support a person’s development better.

First of all, team sports are beneficial as they can help foster various desirable qualities in a person. A great team player is oftentimes also a supportive and cooperative friend, and a visionary who is capable of utilizing team members’ strengths when and where appropriate. A case in point is . To win a match, both players must understand how each other plays. Only in that case can both athletes find a suitable arrangement within a match. Next, both have to place their trust in the other person’s ability to . Moreover, team sports can help build great camaraderie, especially for working adults who do not have time to mingle.

Nevertheless, individual sports are quite advantageous in some cases. the players to learn more about themselves and focus on improving their ability alone. By having to fully bear the weight of any loss or take credit for any success, the player will grow to be a responsible, self-reliant, and confident person. Take chess for chess is an individual sport as this game requires complete trust in one’s ability, speed, and . All of which are difficult to achieve in team sports where many minds are involved in the decision making process.

Overall, even though individual sports offer some positives to a certain extent, I completely agree with the idea that to people develop valuable attributes.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.0

The essay discusses both views and maintains a clear preference for team sports. Its doubles badminton example usefully explains coordination and trust, while the chess example supports self-reliance. The broad claim that these individual qualities are difficult to develop in team sports needs qualification. Agreement errors, a sentence fragment and some awkward expressions also reduce accuracy.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

7.0

Both views are addressed and the preference for team sports is maintained. Doubles badminton is a relevant example of cooperation between teammates, supported by an explanation of coordination and trust. The broader claim that individual qualities are difficult to develop in team sports needs more qualification.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Ideas progress logically within clear paragraphs with functional linking devices, although transitions such as 'Next' and 'Moreover' are occasionally mechanical and cohesion within examples is uneven.

Lexical Resource

7.0

Vocabulary shows good range and precision in places (foster, camaraderie, self-reliant), with only occasional awkward formulations like 'the ability to foresight' that do not impede meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

Complex sentences generally communicate ideas clearly, but there are agreement errors in 'It allows' after plural 'individual sports' and 'team sports is'. The fragment beginning 'All of which' and the structure 'the ability to foresight' also need repair. These errors seldom prevent understanding.