Should Animal Experiments Be Banned

“Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.”

Annotated response

1 correction note

Showing 1 correction note.

Because of scientific research for drugs and pharmaceutical products, millions of animals suffer and die every year. Animal testing is a controversial topic that causes disagreement among the public, with some and others criticizing it. In this essay, both these views will be considered and elaborated upon .

To begin with, animal rights activists and organizations across the globe, like PETA, are pressurizing the government to prohibit experiments on animals. Indeed, animals suffer greatly in many cases during research. It is a pity that they are usually caged in small compartments in enclosed environments. These animals are dissected and injected with all sorts of chemicals to see what results are produced. There is no rationale for this type of suffering, and it violates ethical principles. Although strict regulations are meant to minimize animals’ suffering in research, this has still become the norm .

The use of animals for medical research and other product testing is also justified for many reasons. Nowadays, a growing number of people are in need of high-quality medicines, and these people desire quality medicine to cure and protect them from illness. Using animals, scientists and researchers can test the safety of medications and other substances that humans regularly come into contact with. For example, drugs can have drastic negative effects on humans, so assessing their safety on animals first gives researchers a good chance to determine whether the drugs are safe for humans.

In conclusion, the irrefutable benefits that can be gained from conducting medical experiments on animals for safety and life-saving reasons should justify their use, despite the fact that it is immoral to do so.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.0

The response presents both views in a logical order and ends with a clear personal position, showing solid organization and generally accurate language. The main limitation is that development of the arguments is somewhat uneven and some word choices are imprecise, which keeps the response from reaching a higher level of persuasiveness.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

7.0

Both views are addressed and a clear opinion is given in the conclusion, with relevant supporting ideas, though some arguments remain underdeveloped and the final position acknowledges tension without fully resolving it.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Ideas progress logically across clear paragraphs with effective cohesive devices, although a few transitions are mechanical and links within paragraphs are occasionally loose.

Lexical Resource

7.0

There is sufficient range for the topic, including ethical principles and assessing safety. Praising its need is an imprecise way to say that supporters consider animal testing necessary. Pressurizing the government is a valid British English expression, while drastic negative effects is understandable in this context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

A variety of complex structures is used with generally good control, with only occasional minor errors in punctuation and phrasing that do not impede understanding.