Plastic Pollution Damage and Potential Solutions

Plastic bags, plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment. What damage does plastic do to the environment? What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem?

Annotated response

2 correction notes

Showing 2 correction notes.

Plastic use has increased dramatically over the last 50 years, replacing more traditional packaging such as glass bottles, tins and paper bags. Unfortunately, this has also resulted in a huge amount of plastic being discarded, and this has caused a number of environmental problems.

One of the main problems – one that has only recently been discovered – is that when plastic degrades, it releases which eventually get washed into the water supply. These particles can be toxic if ingested in large enough quantities, and may even be carcinogenic. Another problem is that animals may mistake plastic items for food. For example, seagulls often mistake plastic bags for jellyfish, and try to eat them, causing them to choke and die. Many larger aquatic animals have been found washed up on beaches with their digestive systems full of plastic material.

So what can be done about this? One of the obvious solutions is to make plastic packaging more expensive in order to encourage people to re-use plastic or avoid it altogether. Supermarkets in many countries have started to charge consumers for plastic bags and this has proved to be successful, with many people bringing their own reusable shopping bags. Another solution might be to improve local water supply. In many developing countries, tap water cannot be drunk because it contains bacteria or heavy metals, so people instead buy bottled water. However, this creates a colossal amount of plastic waste since these bottles are single-use. Helping countries like Thailand or Turkey modernise their domestic water supply infrastructure would therefore lead to a large reduction in the use of plastic bottles.

To summarise, plastic packaging has harmful effects , but making it more expensive and improving access to drinkable water in the developing world can go a long way to reducing these problems.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 8.0

The response is a strong, well-developed essay that answers both questions directly with concrete examples, such as supermarket bag charges and water infrastructure in developing countries. Its greatest strength is precise, natural vocabulary and accurate sentence control, while the main limitation is that some ideas, particularly the second solution, could be developed slightly further for full depth.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

8.0

The essay fully addresses both questions, covering water contamination and harm to animals before offering developed, relevant solutions attributed to governments and individuals, with a clear concluding position.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.5

Ideas progress logically across well-managed paragraphs with effective linking and cohesive devices, though the second solution's development is slightly less tightly integrated than the first.

Lexical Resource

8.0

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, using natural collocations such as 'washed into the water supply', 'carcinogenic', 'single-use' and 'colossal amount of plastic waste' with no noticeable inaccuracy.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

8.0

A wide range of structures, including complex relative and conditional clauses, is used accurately and flexibly, with errors rare and never impeding communication.