Planning for the Future vs Living in the Present

Some people believe that planning for the future is a waste of time because they think that focusing on the present is more important. To what do you extent agree or disagree?

Annotated response

1 correction note

Showing 1 correction note.

Many philosophers of the past and the present have advocated for living in the moment instead of focusing on the future; in this essay, I hope to show how this is a flawed view, since one should ideally focus on both.

Proponents of living in the present argue that stressing about what is ahead of us robs us of the joy of living in the moment. This is a line of reasoning that is, for example, intrinsic to Buddhist philosophy, which states that given society’s current focus on future productivity and output, it is important to find joy in day to day activities. By worrying too much about the future, one could argue that one can never truly achieve happiness, since as soon as a person gets what he or she wants, they immediately jump to what they would need next. Overall, it could be said that given our limited time on Earth, it is indeed a waste to spend it purely living in the future.

On the other hand, it is important to plan out what an individual should do in the future in order to ensure a certain level of financial stability. Although it is important to enjoy the moment, not having a clear future plan could result in one becoming poor, ending up in situations they might not necessarily want to be in. give one peace of mind, since not knowing what could potentially happen can lead to anxiety, ruining present enjoyment. Therefore, in order to have both, we should ensure that our future plans are in place.

Overall, I believe that while living in the moment is important, there are practical reasons why one should always plan for the future.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.5

The response's strongest aspect is its clear, well-developed argument, which fairly presents the opposing view before reaching a qualified conclusion that directly answers the question. The main limitation is that the supporting ideas remain somewhat general, relying on broad reasoning rather than concrete, specific examples to deepen the development.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

7.5

The position is clear throughout, both sides of the argument are addressed with relevant explanation, and the qualified conclusion directly answers the question, though support stays somewhat general.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.5

The argument progresses logically through the value of present enjoyment and reasons for future planning. Paragraphs are clearly sequenced and referencing is generally effective. 'Overall' summarises the first body discussion and later introduces the conclusion; it does not open two paragraphs.

Lexical Resource

7.5

Vocabulary is flexible and generally natural, including appropriate phrases such as 'financial stability' and 'peace of mind'. Some wording is broad or repetitive, but the main ideas are expressed clearly. Developing a point in more detail is a task-response issue rather than a lexical error in an otherwise apt term.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.5

Relative, temporal and concessive clauses show a good range and generally strong control. Long sentences remain understandable. Switching among 'one', 'a person' and 'they' makes the style less consistent in places, but singular 'they' is not itself a grammatical error.