人们为何越来越少骑自行车出行

The response addresses both questions, but the convenience argument remains general and the virtual-reality proposal is not developed into a clear way to increase bicycle journeys for transport.

Ideas progress logically across clearly managed paragraphs with effective use of cohesive devices, though a few transitions are slightly mechanical or imprecise.

Vocabulary is sufficiently wide and flexible for the topic, with some natural collocations and less common items, despite occasional awkward or imprecise word choices.

A variety of complex structures is used with generally good control, and while errors in agreement and phrasing recur, they rarely reduce clarity.

The response addresses both questions fully, presents a clear position on causes and measures, and supports the main ideas with relevant explanation, though development is sometimes repetitive rather than deepened.

The argument progresses logically from causes to solutions, with clear signposting and a separate paragraph for the introduction, causes, solutions and conclusion. Repeated framing makes some linking mechanical, as the conclusion restates the causes and measures in almost the same words.

Vocabulary is flexible and generally precise, showing good collocation such as 'ascribed to' and 'dedicated cycling paths', though some phrases are recycled and occasionally overgeneralised.

A wide range of structures is used with generally good control, including complex conditionals and relative clauses, with only occasional non-impeding errors or awkward phrasing.

Both questions are addressed with a clear position, two causes and two relevant solutions supported by company examples. The proposed link between electric-vehicle advertising and a shift away from bicycles could be explained more explicitly.

The cause–solution sequence is easy to follow, with clear referencing and signposting. However, the supplied text uses single line breaks rather than clearly separated paragraphs, so its section boundaries need more visible formatting.

Vocabulary is flexible and largely precise with good collocation, though a few expressions are slightly unnatural or imprecise.

A wide range of structures is used with generally good control, with occasional minor errors or awkward constructions that do not impede communication.

The response addresses both questions with relevant causes, practical measures and a Vietnam example. The main ideas are clear, although the connection between urban growth and declining bicycle use, and between campaign messages and changed travel choices, could be developed more explicitly.

Ideas progress logically across well-managed paragraphs with effective cohesive devices such as 'regarding the former' and 'to begin with', and referencing is generally accurate.

Vocabulary is flexible and topic-appropriate, including phrases like 'dedicated bike lanes' and 'undermined confidence', but frequent repetition of expressions such as 'mode of transport' and 'inadequate' limits precision at the highest level.

A range of complex structures is generally well controlled, including relative clauses, passive constructions and coordinated phrases. Minor problems include the unclear actor in “By creating ... more people may be encouraged” and an unnecessary comma between the final coordinated -ing phrases.