人们改穿西式服装而非传统服装

The response gives a clear positive judgment and discusses cultural and economic objections. Practical reasons and examples are relevant, but claims about cultural disappearance and fabric performance are broad, and the workplace example needs a clearer link to the comparison with traditional dress.

The argument progresses from a position through objections and benefits to a conclusion, with each stage in its own paragraph and varied linking expressions. Some transitions and references are cumbersome, such as the spoken-style 'More on the practicality argument' and the loose 'This is compounded by'.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise, with natural expressions such as 'spell doom' and 'cultural identity', but occasional word-form and spelling errors, including 'wester look', limit full precision.

The response uses complex sentences, including relative and causal clauses, with generally understandable relationships. Accuracy is reduced by errors such as the former is referring to clothes, less of market, and the missing relative pronoun in blue collar workers wear.