了解他人生活方式视频与文字哪个更好

The response addresses the question directly with a clear position, develops two main advantages with explanation and examples, and acknowledges a counterpoint, though the conclusion expresses the stance slightly imprecisely.

Ideas progress logically with clear referencing and useful transitions. The third paragraph moves from communication benefits to bias and source selection; separating that concession would give each argumentative function a clearer focus.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise for the topic, including phrases like immersive, nuanced perspective, and nonverbal communication, with no errors that impede meaning.

A range of complex structures is used with good control, including relative clauses, a concessive opening and coordinated clauses, with only minor awkwardness that does not impede meaning.

The response addresses all parts of the task with a clear, consistently maintained qualified position, and main ideas are developed with relevant explanation, though support is occasionally general rather than extended.

Ideas are logically organised across clear paragraphs with a range of cohesive devices used naturally, and progression throughout the response is easy to follow.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise for the topic, with some less common items such as 'retention of specific details' and 'stimulating and entertaining', though occasional phrasing is slightly informal or formulaic.

A wide range of structures is used with generally good control, including complex sentences and inversion ('Not only is it far easier...'), with only minor, non-impeding errors in punctuation and grammar.