电视对文化发展的影响

The response addresses the question with a clear both-sides position and relevant main ideas, but the ideas are only partially developed and some sentences are so unclear that support is hard to follow.

The essay uses an overall paragraph structure and basic linkers, but progression within paragraphs is often disrupted by incoherent or incomplete sentences that impede the flow of ideas.

Vocabulary shows some attempt at topic-related range such as cultural development and customs, but usage is frequently imprecise or unnatural, as in spreads its legs and become like alien masses.

A mix of simple and complex forms is attempted, yet errors in verb forms, articles, agreement, and sentence construction are frequent and sometimes obscure the intended meaning.

The response addresses the question with a clear, though qualified, position covering both negative and positive effects, but main ideas such as the robbery and dowry examples are unevenly or implausibly developed, limiting the support.

Progression is broadly clear with an introduction, two-sided body, and conclusion, but cohesion is mechanical, relying on formulaic linkers like 'On the other hand' and 'All in all', and some ideas within paragraphs are loosely connected.

Vocabulary is adequate for the task with some appropriate items such as 'glamorous', 'status system', and 'luxurious life', but range is limited by repetition of phrases like 'very much', 'lifestyle', and 'a friend'.

A mix of simple and complex structures is used with some accurate subordinate clauses, but frequent errors such as 'which is nowadays showing on television', 'He started the robbery', and article misuse reduce overall accuracy.

The response addresses both sides of the question and reaches a clear conclusion, but the ideas are developed in general terms with limited specific reference to the candidate's own society, and the stated extent of the impact is not fully pinned down.

Ideas are arranged logically across clear paragraphs with effective linking devices and a coherent progression from introduction to conclusion.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise, with phrases such as 'dissemination of information' and 'erosion of values', though some expressions are formulaic or clichéd.

Complex sentences, relative clauses and participial phrases are used with generally good control. The sequence "has led to ... leading to" is grammatical, although somewhat wordy. The main opportunity is clearer development of the cultural claims rather than treating that construction as a grammar error.

The response addresses all parts of the question with a clear, consistently maintained position and relevantly developed main ideas, though some supporting points remain general rather than fully extended.

Ideas progress logically across well-managed paragraphs with a range of cohesive devices used naturally, with only minor mechanical linkage such as the abrupt 'Also' paragraph opening.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise for the argument, featuring items like 'assert their own culture' and 'universal themes', though range is occasionally less ambitious and a slip such as 'much' for 'must' occurs.

A variety of complex structures is used with good control, including relative clauses and participial phrases, with errors being minor and rarely impeding communication.