是否应缩短工作周并延长周末

The position is clear and consistently maintained, with each main idea supported by relevant explanation and examples, though development is somewhat formulaic and limited in depth.

The essay progresses logically through well-managed paragraphs with effective cohesive devices, although linking is at times mechanical and predictable.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise for the topic, with some less common items, though phrasing occasionally leans on conventional collocations and repetition.

A range of complex structures is used with good control and frequent accuracy, with only minor, non-impeding slips such as stray spacing before punctuation.

The position is clear throughout, all parts of the question are addressed, and main ideas are extended and supported, though development relies on general reasoning and hypothetical examples rather than deeper elaboration.

Ideas progress logically across well-organized paragraphs with a range of cohesive devices used naturally, although sequencing within paragraphs is occasionally formulaic.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise, with natural collocations such as 'epidemic levels' and 'afford people a break,' though occasional phrases are somewhat informal or imprecise for the register.

A variety of complex structures, including conditionals and relative clauses, are used with good control, and errors are rare and non-impeding.

The response presents a clear position throughout, addresses all parts of the task, and develops main ideas with relevant, though somewhat generalised, support.

Ideas are logically organised with clear progression and a range of cohesive devices used naturally, though paragraph development remains routine rather than fully sophisticated.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise, with good topic-specific collocations such as operational costs and round-the-clock operations, with only rare minor imprecision.

A variety of complex sentence structures is used with good flexibility and control, and errors are rare and non-impeding.

The response directly addresses the question with a clear, sustained position, covers both sides relevantly, and develops main ideas with explanation and examples, though support occasionally stays general.

Ideas progress logically through well-structured paragraphs with cohesive devices and clear referencing, with only occasional slightly mechanical linking such as the formulaic conclusion.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, with natural collocation and sophisticated items like repercussions, engender, and profit forecasts, and virtually no inaccuracy.

A wide range of complex structures is used with strong accuracy and punctuation control, with only rare, non-impeding slips in articles and comma placement.

The position is clear and consistently held, both sides of the argument are developed with relevant explanation and an example, and the conclusion follows logically from the discussion.

Ideas progress logically across well-managed paragraphs, with cohesive devices used naturally and referencing that keeps the argument coherent throughout.

Vocabulary is wide, precise, and natural, with idiomatic academic phrasing and flexible paraphrase used accurately with very few lapses.

A full range of complex structures is used with flexibility and accuracy, including conditionals, relative clauses, and balanced concession forms, with errors rare and non-impeding.

The response fully addresses the task with a clear, consistent position, well-developed main ideas, and relevant supporting examples throughout.

Ideas progress logically across well-managed paragraphs with a range of cohesive devices used naturally, though development occasionally stays at a conventional level.

A wide vocabulary is used with precision and naturalness, including topic-appropriate items such as burnout, alleviate unemployment, and work-life balance, with only rare minor slips.

A wide range of structures, including complex conditionals and relative clauses, is used flexibly and accurately, with errors rare and non-impeding.

The response directly answers the question with a clear position, develops well-chosen main ideas with concrete examples such as the Sweden trials and Microsoft Japan study, and concedes counterarguments, though the conclusion mentions gender equality without prior development.

Ideas are logically organized in clear paragraphs with effective cohesive devices, with progression generally smooth, though the conclusion's reference to gender equality briefly disrupts cohesion.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, using natural collocations such as burnout, diminished returns, and one-size-fits-all, with only rare imprecision.

A wide range of complex structures is used with good control and frequent error-free sentences, with only occasional minor awkwardness such as in work produced in longer hours.

The response directly answers the question with a clear position, covers well-chosen main ideas, and supports them with relevant explanation and examples throughout.

Ideas progress logically across clearly managed paragraphs with effective cohesive devices, though some linking and elaboration is slightly mechanical or list-like.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, with natural collocation such as 'burnout, stress, and fatigue' and 'reducing turnover rates', and only rare imprecision.

A wide range of complex structures is used with strong control and accuracy, allowing consistently clear meaning with only minor slips.