立法限制员工工作时长

The response addresses both questions and offers reasons for such laws, but the position on whether it is a positive or negative development is muddled, with the essay appearing to argue for the laws while declaring the development negative, and some ideas are unevenly developed.

There is a clear paragraph structure and progression of ideas, but cohesive devices are often mechanical or misused, and some linkages between sentences and claims are loose or confusing.

The writer attempts a wide range of less common vocabulary, but repeated inaccuracies such as 'fertile', 'dispensable', 'shrink the work' and 'loose their efficiency' reduce precision and occasionally affect clarity.

A mix of complex structures is attempted with some success, yet errors in tense consistency, subject-verb agreement, and punctuation are fairly frequent, though meaning is mostly recoverable.

The response addresses both questions, states a consistent position, and develops main ideas with explanation and a relevant example, though development in the second body paragraph is occasionally stretched.

Ideas progress logically across clear paragraphs with a range of cohesive devices, although some transitions are used mechanically and one paragraph contains a coherence lapse.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and topical, with some precise phrases, but occasional unnatural collocations and wordy expressions reduce precision.

A variety of complex structures is used with generally good control, though the detached industries phrase and the construction beginning consider a small business weaken sentence accuracy.

The response addresses both questions, presents a consistent and clear positive position, and develops relevant main ideas on health, morale, and productivity, though some points remain general rather than fully extended.

Ideas are logically sequenced across clear paragraphs with effective use of cohesive devices such as therefore, in addition, and overall, with only occasional slightly mechanical linking.

The response shows a good range of topic-appropriate vocabulary including detrimental, susceptible, and pivotal, with generally precise usage and only occasional awkward collocations like legitimate working hours.

A variety of complex structures, including relative clauses and coordinated clauses, is used with generally good control. Errors in verb patterns, tense consistency and the modifier after applying these rules do not prevent understanding.

The response addresses both questions, presents a clear positive position, and supports it with relevant reasons and examples, though development of the main ideas remains somewhat general rather than fully extended.

Ideas are logically sequenced across clear paragraphs with appropriate linking devices, though some connectors like 'Firstly' and 'Regardless of the reason' are used somewhat mechanically.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible for the topic, with phrases like 'sleep deprivation' and 'restricting working hours', but occasional imprecise word choices and collocations such as 'corporate' and 'a warmer cooperation attitude' reduce precision.

A range of complex structures is used with generally good control, including conditional and relative clauses. Local problems include the misleading agent in “By restricting working hours, employees...” and the incomplete degree expression “as much a toll”.

The response directly addresses both questions, presents a clear and consistent positive position, and develops each main idea with relevant explanation and examples across a full-length answer.

Ideas progress logically within and across clear paragraphs, with appropriate linking devices. The phrase For both businesses introduces an unexplained pair, and the reference this after the overtime example could be more explicit.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, with effective use of topic-appropriate collocations such as chronic stress, work–life balance, and healthcare burdens, with only rare imprecision.

A wide range of sentence structures is used accurately and flexibly, including complex cause-effect constructions and relative clauses, with only minimal, non-impeding errors.

The response addresses both questions directly, maintains a clear and consistent positive position, and supports main ideas with relevant explanation and credible examples across well-sequenced paragraphs.

Ideas progress logically within and across paragraphs, with effective use of cohesive devices and referencing, producing a coherent and easy-to-follow argument.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, with natural collocations such as 'safeguard employees' health', 'exploitation', and 'ripple effects', and only minimal, non-impeding inaccuracy.

A wide range of complex structures is used accurately, including relative clauses, passive constructions and participial clauses, with generally strong control of sentence structure.