为未来向年轻人投入更多资源

The essay addresses the question directly with a clear, consistent position throughout, developing two relevant main ideas with examples, though the depth of support remains somewhat general.

Ideas progress logically across well-managed paragraphs with a range of cohesive devices used naturally, although linking between some sentences relies on predictable connectors.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise, with good collocations such as social cohesion and adapting to the changing economic landscape, with only minor instances of slightly formulaic phrasing.

A wide range of structures is used with flexibility and accuracy, including complex sentences and participial constructions, with only occasional minor punctuation slips.

The response addresses the question directly, states a clear qualified position, and develops main ideas with relevant explanation, though the opposing viewpoint is less fully elaborated than the supporting arguments.

The argument has a recognisable sequence from youth contributions to technology and older people, but single line breaks leave these stages within one supplied paragraph. Some linking expressions also signal relationships imprecisely.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, with natural collocations such as 'labor force', 'social cohesion' and 'global competitiveness', and only rare lapses in word choice.

Complex sentences and subordinate clauses show considerable range and generally strong control. The long sentence about older employees would be easier to follow with clearer subjects and parallel verbs.

The essay maintains a qualified disagreement and proposes relevant alternatives. Its comparison would be stronger if it explained the budget trade-off and showed more fully why healthcare and infrastructure deserve priority over additional youth-focused investment.

Ideas follow a clear overall sequence and linking devices generally guide the reader effectively. Separating healthcare and infrastructure into distinct paragraphs and clarifying the reference to social welfare would make the two alternative priorities easier to follow.

Vocabulary is wide and natural, with precise phrases such as 'fostering human capital development' and 'healthcare disparities', and only rare slips.

A wide range of structures, including complex and relative clauses, is used with flexibility and consistent accuracy.