国际体育赛事与全球紧张局势

The position of broad agreement is stated and supported with two relevant main ideas and examples, but the argument is only partially expressed because many points are too unclear or distorted to be fully developed.

A conventional paragraph structure with introductory and concluding framing is present, yet cohesion is largely mechanical and progression breaks down where meaning becomes unclear within body paragraphs.

There is an evident attempt at less common vocabulary such as 'de-escalate' and 'paramount', but frequent misselection and misuse, including 'plebeians', 'excreted', and 'scales', obscure meaning regularly.

A mix of complex structures is attempted, but frequent grammatical errors, such as 'releasing their will of patriotism inner harmless way' and faulty relative constructions, reduce clarity throughout.

The essay addresses the question with a clear partial-agreement position, develops relevant main ideas about cost, diplomacy, and patriotic feeling, and supports them with examples, though some ideas remain somewhat underdeveloped or imprecisely connected to the claim.

Progression is broadly clear with paragraphing and linking devices, but cohesion is sometimes mechanical and logical links between sentences, such as the counterargument paragraph's abrupt framing, are not always smooth.

There is an adequate range of vocabulary with some attempts at less common items like 'hefty', 'inculcate', and 'concur', but noticeable errors in collocation and word choice, such as 'laid statement' and 'trail paragraphs', reduce precision.

A mix of simple and complex sentence forms is used with some flexibility, but frequent grammatical errors, including faulty parallelism, tense inconsistency, and pronoun problems, are present although meaning is mostly recoverable.

The response presents a clear position and develops the patriotic-emotion side with a relevant example, but it addresses the easing of international tensions only superficially, so coverage is uneven.

Paragraphing is logical and progression is broadly clear with simple cohesive devices, though some connections, such as the shift to a scheduling argument, feel mechanical or loosely tied to the main idea.

There is adequate range of vocabulary and some attempts at less common items, but collocations are frequently awkward or imprecise, including phrases like ease the border pressure, in-built function, and patriotic emotions in a safe mode.

A mix of simple and complex structures is used with generally acceptable accuracy, but recurring errors in articles, prepositions, verb forms, and phrasing such as the first cup for an Indian country slightly reduce precision.

The response addresses all parts of the task with a clearly stated position, well-developed main ideas, and relevant examples such as India-Pakistan cricket relations, though some ideas in the final body paragraph remain thinly extended.

The argument progresses logically across paragraphs with a clear conclusion, but cohesion is at times mechanical, with formulaic connectors and some abrupt sentence boundaries weakening flow.

Vocabulary is generally adequate for the topic with some apt phrasing, but recurring errors such as 'through out', 'get know', 'despite of', and 'it rises their patriotic emotions' reduce precision.

There is a mix of simple and complex structures with some accurate complex sentences, but frequent errors in agreement, articles, and tense, such as 'sports events held' and 'not only helps', persist throughout.

The response addresses the question directly with a clear, consistently maintained position, developing both the tension-easing and patriotic-emotion claims across well-extended paragraphs with relevant illustration.

Ideas progress logically through a concession-rebuttal structure with effective cohesive devices, though some repetition of ideas and slightly overlong sentences occasionally reduce the crispness of progression.

Vocabulary is generally flexible and precise, with natural phrases like predicated on the assumption and getting carried away, but occasional awkward or imprecise wording, such as victory cannot be accomplished and nationalism for the whole country, limits the range.

A wide range of complex structures is used with good flexibility and mostly strong accuracy, though minor errors in pluralization and article use recur without impeding meaning.