引进外国影视作品与制作本土影视作品

The response addresses all parts of the task, discusses both views with developed explanation and a relevant example, and presents a clear, consistent opinion that both types are equally important.

Ideas are logically organised with clear paragraphing and a range of cohesive devices used naturally, though some referencing such as 'this way' is slightly loose.

The response uses a sufficient range of vocabulary with some precision and less common items such as 'cultural assimilation' and 'long-standing ethics', with occasional awkward or inaccurate choices like 'aborted' and the misspelling 'absorded'.

Complex clauses are used with generally good control. The opening sentence needs a clearer contrast between the two views, and some references to preceding ideas could be more explicit.

The essay addresses both views with relevant, extended ideas and a clear personal opinion, though some development is slightly repetitive rather than sharply elaborated.

Ideas progress logically within clearly organised paragraphs and are linked by a range of cohesive devices, with only occasional slightly forced transitions.

There is a good range of vocabulary and some less common items used naturally, alongside occasional awkward or imprecise collocations such as 'film segments' and 'not deemed daring'.

The response uses varied complex sentence structures with generally good control, although minor agreement and word-form errors occur without impeding meaning.

The response addresses all parts of the task, discussing both views with relevant examples and giving a clear personal position, though some ideas are developed rather briefly.

Ideas progress logically across clear paragraphs with varied cohesive devices. Some causal links, especially from imported productions to domestic success, would benefit from a more explicit intermediate step.

Vocabulary is reasonably wide and precise, including items like 'culturally embedded' and 'technical expertise', with some less idiomatic collocations that do not impede meaning.

A good range of complex structures is used with generally strong control, with occasional minor errors in agreement and pronoun reference that rarely affect clarity.