儿童每天看电视的影响

The response discusses both views and maintains a clear qualified opinion. However, daily viewing is not directly examined, and the crime example assumes a causal link that its stated evidence does not establish.

Ideas are logically organised with effective paragraphing and a range of cohesive devices used naturally, with only occasional mechanical linking.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise, with good use of topic-related terms such as 'unsuitable', 'detrimental impact' and 'constructive', despite some less idiomatic combinations.

A variety of complex structures is used with generally good control. The missing determiner or plural in “learn violent attitude” is a minor grammatical error; “broadcasted” is an accepted past form and should not be counted as a grammatical error.

The essay addresses both views and states a clear opinion, with main ideas developed through reasons and examples, though some arguments remain broadly rather than deeply elaborated.

Ideas progress logically across clear paragraphs with varied cohesive devices, though a few transitions and pronoun links are slightly mechanical or imprecise.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and topic-appropriate, with some idiomatic attempts, but occasional inaccuracies such as 'in face' and 'unsuitable contents' limit precision.

A good range of complex structures, including relative and concessive clauses, is used with generally reliable control, despite some minor errors in articles and phrasing.