2008年英国男女每日家务与休闲时间

The response covers all categories with accurate figures and a clear overview of the contrasting gender patterns. The repair estimates are reasonable readings of the bars. The summary could identify the dominant categories more explicitly, and the media figures should be clearly restricted to their combined category.

Progression is logical and cohesive devices are used appropriately, though the paragraph structure is somewhat mechanical in listing each activity in turn rather than grouping the most significant comparisons.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise for describing data, with good use of terms such as 'dedicated', 'allocated' and 'gender disparities', though some phrases like 'on the same' are slightly awkward.

A wide range of structures is used accurately, including comparative and contrastive constructions, with only occasional minor awkwardness that does not impede meaning.

The response covers all categories with sound numerical comparisons and identifies the dominant activities. However, time spent is sometimes described as preference or popularity, and the reference to a survey adds a collection method not stated in the visuals.

Ideas are organised into logical paragraphing with a clear overview, and cohesive devices such as 'Conversely', 'Regarding', and 'A similar pattern' guide the reader smoothly through the data.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise for describing data, including phrases like 'took up the most time', 'dedicated significantly more time', and 'albeit slightly', with natural collocation and no noticeable errors.

A wide range of structures is used accurately, including complex comparative clauses, participial phrasing, and correct passive and relative constructions, with only rare minor lapses.