1998年与2008年博物馆平面图

The response reports several visible changes, but the overview does not identify the main replacements and expansion. The restaurant comparison refers to the northeastern rather than northwestern corner; the shop, bags-and-coats area and temporary exhibition room are treated as additions although they were relocated. The permanent exhibition rooms changed substantially, and the WC relocation is omitted.

Separate paragraphs give the description a recognisable structure, but some linking is loose. Again introduces a new location rather than a repeated point, and the long restaurant sentence combines an absence, an addition and a relocation without clearly locating the moved room. More direct links between each original position and its 2008 counterpart would improve progression.

The response uses relevant terms such as layout, renovations and temporary exhibition room. However, the overview ends with the vague phrase and so on, and occupies reverses the intended containment relationship: the central area contains the garden and other features. Created also misrepresents facilities that already existed and were moved.

The response attempts varied structures, including inversion, a relative clause and a semicolon linking contrasting clauses. Control is generally understandable, but in constructing the 2008 museum has an illogical implied subject, and at the southwestern part should be in the southwestern part. These points need correction even though the intended meaning can usually be recovered.

The response describes both years and identifies the replacement of western galleries with visitor facilities. However, the WC is presented as newly added despite appearing in both plans, the café is placed too centrally, and shelter is inferred without evidence. The eastern exhibition expansion is omitted; the shop’s adjacency to the entrance is correctly reported.

Ideas progress logically through a clear overview followed by systematic year-by-year descriptions, with effective use of cohesive devices like flanking phrases and directional references.

Vocabulary is varied and generally effective for a map description, including terms such as layout, comprised and relocated. Some spatial expressions could be more precise: flanked normally suggests placement at the sides, while lower level can suggest a separate storey rather than the bottom of a plan.

The response uses varied structures, including participle clauses, passive constructions and locative phrasing, with generally good control. The final sentence contains a comma splice between two independent clauses; a conjunction or full stop is needed to connect the garden description and the rearrangement of southern facilities.