Trying New Things vs Sticking to Familiar Routines

Some people like to try new things, for example, places to visit and types of food. Other people prefer to keep doing things they are familiar with. Discuss both these attitudes and give your own opinion.

Annotated response

17 correction notes

Showing 17 correction notes.

It is that choice is different as per person, and it is seen that with time. Numerous people around the world prefer to do a different kind of experience such as , . However, others do not like to make a change in routine life. Both notions have their own pros and cons; therefore, before commenting on my view, I will discuss both views in the following paragraphs, along with a logical conclusion.

On the one hand, The first one is time, in this contemporary era, the thus, no time for new sites. The second one is a personal choice, around the globe, there is a plethora of humankind who does not prefer to change their own lifestyle especially older people. They desire to live life in the same way as . changing livelihood, , trying new things and yield energy.

On the other hand, having a is also beneficial for a person. In other words, after visiting a experience and knowledge about that territory. In this digital era, new things also . If a person lives the same life without a change in daily life, then easily thinks negative and tired from life so, pivotal to do out of the box such as try new food dishes. However, it is expensive for penurious people.

In conclusion, although trying some different render person to life and also useful in many ways rather than strict with no-change rules. In my view, trying different things is a attitude.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 5.5

The response addresses both attitudes and states a personal opinion, and it follows a conventional paragraph structure with some connective phrases. Its main limitations are imprecise vocabulary, frequent grammatical errors that often obscure meaning, and underdeveloped, sometimes confusing explanations of the ideas raised.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

5.5

Both attitudes are discussed and a clear opinion is given, but ideas are only partly developed and explanations are often unclear or unconvincing, reflecting partial task achievement.

Coherence and Cohesion

5.5

A four-paragraph structure and basic cohesive devices are present, but progression within paragraphs is weak, transitions are mechanical, and some statements do not connect logically to what precedes them.

Lexical Resource

5.0

The response attempts some less common vocabulary such as 'plethora' and 'penurious', but much of the wording is restricted and frequently misused, and errors in word choice and word formation reduce precision and clarity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

5.0

A mix of simple and complex forms is attempted, yet frequent errors in agreement, article use, and sentence construction often obscure the intended message, fitting a limited grammatical range with regular inaccuracy.