Sample response & feedback

Future of Printed Newspapers and Books

Question

In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Annotated response

12 correction notes

Showing 12 correction notes.

Many people claim that in the future, printed newspapers or books will become obsolete because online reading materials are available for everyone. Personally, I firmly disagree with this conviction because printed newspapers and books will always have a place in our lives and not all online reading materials are free of charge.

To begin with, saying that people can is fallacious. I admit that there are many websites that allow people to read without having to pay anything. However, popular online newspapers, such as The Economist or New Scientist, offer subscription plans for full access to premium features while are limited to only a small number of articles. Similarly, most ebooks and other types of online contents, if legally distributed, are only available for purchase.

In addition, there will always be people who prefer to buy printed newspapers and books for many reasons. Reading free articles on a screen is oftentimes a test of concentration due to the disturbance from constant pop-up advertisements or message notifications. Furthermore, many people buy printed materials because they value the experience of reading and collecting physical books. Some people love the smell of and a book when reading it. seek to buy every paperback simply because they enjoy building their own physical collections.

In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the statement that people will no longer pay for printed newspapers and books. Besides, it is flawed to claim that people can read everything on the Internet for free.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.0

The response presents a clear, consistently maintained disagreement with the statement and supports it with two well-developed reasons, including a relevant paid-subscription example. Its strongest aspect is the logical, fully addressed argument structure, while the main limitation is a scattering of small language inaccuracies such as 'appealed to' and 'written their favorite authors' that slightly weaken precision.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

TR Task Response

7.0

The response directly addresses the question with a clear, firmly stated position, and both main ideas are developed with relevant explanation and examples throughout.

CC Coherence and Cohesion

7.0

Ideas progress logically across cohesive paragraphs with appropriate cohesive devices, though some linking is slightly mechanical.

LR Lexical Resource

7.0

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and mostly precise, with less common items like 'fallacious', 'obsolete', and 'subscription plans', marred by occasional inaccuracy such as 'non-subcribers'.

GRA Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

A variety of complex structures is used with generally good control, although errors in prepositions and relative clauses, such as 'written their favorite authors', appear occasionally.