Choosing University Subjects: Personal Interest vs Useful Fields

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Annotated response

3 correction notes

Showing 3 correction notes.

The debate over whether university students should have the freedom to study subjects of their choice or be limited to those deemed more utilitarian has long been a controversial issue. In this essay, I will examine both viewpoints and argue that granting students the liberty to pursue their passions and interests is vital for fostering creativity. This approach ultimately helps build individuals who do better in their careers and contribute more to society.

On the one hand, proponents of teaching useful science subjects at the tertiary level argue that it promotes individual interests in education and skill development. that a practical approach to education is important in an ever-changing job market driven by technology and scientific advancements. In this modern era when the job market is highly competitive, it is essential to equip students with skills that align with future career opportunities. A recent study conducted by the University of Illinois shows that science, technology, engineering, and mathematics can better prepare students for the demands of the job market, where expertise in these fields is highly sought after.

On the other hand, advocates of allowing students to study whatever subjects they like believe that it promotes intrinsic motivation, as students are more likely to be enthusiastic and engaged when studying subjects that align with their interests. This passion can drive them to excel and explore the subject matter in greater depth. Additionally, allowing students to follow their passions nurtures a love for learning, making education a fulfilling and lifelong pursuit. When students are free to choose their academic path, they become active participants in their education, leading to a more meaningful and empowering learning experience. As a result, the university builds leaders not just workers. Those well-rounded individuals are more adept in their professional life and help society flourish.

In conclusion, granting university students the freedom to study subjects of their choice is essential for nurturing individual growth, creativity, and lifelong learning. Allowing students to follow their passions empowers them to take ownership of their education, leading to more meaningful and fulfilling academic experiences. It is expected that universities would consider the benefit of this approach in education and help build a prosperous and thriving nation.

Overall assessment

Why this response received Band 7.5

The response's strongest aspect is its clear, well-structured argument that addresses both viewpoints while maintaining a consistent personal position throughout. The main limitation is the occasionally vague or underdeveloped support, such as generic claims and an unspecific reference to a study, which keeps the ideas from being fully extended.

IELTS criteria

How each score was decided

Task Response

7.5

The essay addresses all parts of the task, presents both views and a clear, consistently maintained opinion, and develops main ideas with relevant if sometimes generic support.

Coherence and Cohesion

7.5

Ideas progress logically across well-managed paragraphs with effective cohesive devices, though transitions are at times formulaic and linkages within paragraphs occasionally loose.

Lexical Resource

7.0

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and largely precise with good collocation such as 'intrinsic motivation' and 'foster creativity', with only occasional less natural phrasing like 'promotes individual interests'.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

7.0

A variety of complex structures is used with generally good control, and errors are minor and infrequent, though some sentences are wordy or slightly awkward.