Friends with Similar or Opposing Views

5 Sample Responses · Bands 6.0–7.0

Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Same question · Different responses

Sample responses and feedback

Response 01

Must fixSuggested

While some think it’s a good idea to choose friends who share their viewpoints, others think it is far better to have friends who are in disagreement with them. I think it is better to have friends that do not always agree with us.

To begin with, when a group of friends share the same opinion and do not contradict each other, it leads to boredom. Like, friends having the same taste in food will not be encouraged to try out new cuisines and this in turn will not broaden their perspective. Also, lack of different opinions may lead to prejudices and stereotypes against those who have an alternative perspective.

Moreover, outside the group of like-minded people, an individual might feel isolated when others do not support them. It might lead to social isolation and lack of different learning. Sometimes, in a group with consistent opinions, there may be a risk of blind acceptance, where individuals follow the group without independent thought. As a result, friends may follow the group pattern rather than having true personal interest in certain behaviours or preferences.

In conclusion, I think it’s important to have a friend that doesn’t always agree with us. This is due to the fact that a relationship requires different strategies for self-improvement than just support, and accepting one’s flaws does not imply ignoring them.

Score details

Response 01
Estimated band6.0/ 9

Overall assessment

The response presents a clear personal position and maintains it throughout, with relevant if somewhat generic supporting ideas. Its main limitations are that the first view is discussed only implicitly rather than directly, development is thin in places, and the response falls short of the required length.

TR

Task Response

A clear position is given and relevant ideas are presented, but the view favouring like-minded friends is addressed only obliquely through criticism rather than genuine discussion, development is limited, and the response is 26 words under the minimum length.

5.5
CC

Coherence and Cohesion

Progression is broadly clear with logical paragraphing and linking devices such as 'Moreover' and 'As a result', though some cohesion is mechanical and ideas within paragraphs occasionally blur together.

6.0
LR

Lexical Resource

Vocabulary is generally adequate for the task with some appropriate collocations like 'broaden their perspective' and 'blind acceptance', but there are imprecise phrases such as 'lack of different learning' and 'different strategies for self-improvement'.

6.0
GRA

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

A mix of simple and complex sentences is generally controlled, including relative and conditional clauses. Some constructions are awkward, particularly the final comparison between strategies for self-improvement and support, but meaning remains clear.

6.5

What to work on next

Discuss each view in its own clearly developed paragraph, adding concrete examples and enough additional content to meet the length requirement.

From essays on this question

Useful vocabulary

Practise this question

Write your response

Task 2 question loaded.
Part 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write at least 250 words.

Words: 040:00 starts on first word