学院咖啡厅改造前后的平面图

The response provides an overview and reports most key features and changes accurately, but some details are imprecise, such as describing the barbecue as on the right when it sits on the far left, and the vague reference to tables and chairs placement, which limits accuracy and detail selection.

The organisation follows a logical before-and-after progression with linking devices like 'Overall' and 'But today', yet cohesion is at times mechanical or informal, including 'If we talk about' and abrupt sentence openings.

Vocabulary is adequate for the task with appropriate map language such as 'converted into', 'remained unchanged', and 'section', but it lacks flexibility and precision, with informal phrasing and repetition of simple terms like 'right side' and 'left side'.

A range of structures is attempted, but errors are frequent enough to be noticeable, including subject-verb agreement ('the cafe now have'), tense inconsistency ('toilets and bin are present'), and faulty parallelism, though meaning remains generally clear.

The overview identifies the main conversions and outdoor additions, and the response covers most key features. However, it places the two plans left and right although they are stacked vertically, describes the outdoor area as a converted wall, and calls the current recycling bins singular.

Ideas progress logically through a before-and-after organisation with workable referencing and linking, but connector use is at times mechanical or faulty, as in the sentence beginning with 'Whereas'.

Vocabulary is adequate for the task, with terms such as 'renovation', 'converted' and 'sections'. Some wording is awkward or imprecise, including 'displays modernization', 'nearer to' without a stated comparison, and describing a serving area as a small room.

The response attempts passives and complex clauses, but recurrent errors include 'were consist of', 'was consist of', missing articles and 'to reused'. The sentence beginning 'Whereas' is incomplete, whereas the singular passive 'is added' is grammatically possible.

The response covers the key additions and organises comparisons around their locations, with an overview of added seating and changed facilities. Detail would be sharper with direct facility descriptions and accurate singular or plural references to the original bin and central tables.

Ideas progress logically through spatial organisation with cohesive devices such as 'Before the redesign', 'In the center', and 'Finally', giving a generally clear sequence, though some linking is slightly mechanical.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible for describing change, using items like 'restructured', 'replaced by', 'adjacent to', and 'in its place', with only minor imprecision such as 'facilitate more students'.

Passives and a relative clause provide structural variety, but article omissions in 'new coffee bar and take away food section' and agreement errors such as 'toilets ... which has' reduce accuracy. Several singular pronouns also leave plural references unclear.

The response identifies the main new counters, recycling bins, barbecue and outdoor seating, and compares the two layouts clearly. However, it overstates the reorganisation of the retained indoor seating area and places the staff rooms and replacement counters in the centre rather than along its upper edge.

Paragraphing logically separates overview, original layout and redesign, and cohesive devices such as 'whereas', 'while' and 'following the redesign' guide the reader smoothly through the comparison.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise for a map task, with natural location and change expressions like 'gave way to', 'converted into', 'extensively reorganised' and 'situated in the bottom right-hand corner'.

A wide range of structures is used with accuracy, including inverted forms such as 'Occupying the centre of the café were two staff dining rooms' and well-controlled relative and participle clauses.

The response covers the main facilities, gives an overview and makes detailed comparisons. However, the rooms change use rather than being dismantled or newly partitioned, and the final claim that the space is unchanged overlooks the outdoor expansion.

Ideas progress logically through an overview, internal changes, and external additions, with cohesive devices such as 'Originally', 'In today's layout' and 'The clearest additions' managing comparison seamlessly.

Vocabulary is varied and often effective, including 'runs along the left-hand wall' and 'remain in their original positions'. However, 'dismantled' and 'partitioned' inaccurately describe conversion, while 'handed over a single serving area' is an awkward spatial expression.

Long coordinated sentences, passive forms and subordinate clauses such as 'whilst the kitchen ... survived untouched' show strong control. Most structures are accurate, and the main weaknesses concern factual precision and word choice rather than grammar.