正式教育应从几岁开始

Both views are addressed and a clear opinion is stated and maintained, though the early-education view is developed less fully than the opposing position and supporting detail is uneven.

Paragraphing is logical and progression is broadly clear, but transitions are sometimes mechanical and the second paragraph relies on general assertion rather than cohesive development of ideas.

There is a wide range of less common vocabulary attempted, but recurring unnatural collocations such as 'significant others', 'budded with bolstered fundamentals' and 'bone of innumerable discussions' reduce precision.

A variety of complex structures is used with generally clear meaning, though frequent minor errors in article use, agreement and phrasing are noticeable throughout.

The response addresses both views, presents a consistent opinion, and develops main ideas with explanation and an example, though the Finland evidence is partly conceded away and some support remains generalized.

Ideas are organized into clear paragraphs with logical progression and effective cohesive devices, with only occasional mechanical linking and a slightly digressive concession in the third paragraph.

Vocabulary is reasonably varied and precise for the topic, showing some natural collocation, but includes occasional awkwardness and minor errors such as 'growing momentum towards movements' and 'room to breath'.

A range of complex structures is used with generally good flexibility and control, while minor grammatical slips and occasional wordiness do not impede communication.

The essay addresses all parts of the task, discusses both views with developed supporting ideas and a relevant example, and presents a clear, consistent opinion throughout.

Ideas are logically organised with clear paragraphing and mostly effective cohesive devices, though occasional misuses such as 'Otherwise' slightly disrupt progression.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and mostly precise, including items like 'personality formation' and 'invisible burden', with some awkward collocations reducing precision.

A variety of complex structures is used with generally good control, and errors are minor and rarely impede understanding.

The response directly addresses both views and sustains a clear, consistently supported opinion throughout, with relevant examples and a conclusive recommendation.

Ideas are logically sequenced within and across paragraphs, with a range of cohesive devices used effectively, though some referencing and linking remains slightly mechanical.

The response shows a good range of topic-related vocabulary and some natural collocation, with occasional slightly imprecise or formulaic word choices.

A variety of complex structures, including relative clauses and conditional framing, is used flexibly with generally accurate punctuation and only minor, non-impeding slips.

The response addresses all parts of the task, discusses both views, and presents a clear, consistently supported position throughout.

Ideas progress logically across clear paragraphs with effective use of cohesive devices and referencing, with only minor mechanical spacing issues around punctuation.

Vocabulary is sufficiently flexible and precise, with natural academic phrasing such as formative years and psychologically unprepared, though occasional expressions are somewhat informal or general.

A variety of complex structures, including conditionals and subordinate clauses, is used with good control and only occasional awkward constructions that do not impede meaning.

The essay addresses all parts of the task, discussing both views with a clear opinion and supported main ideas, though the second view is developed slightly less fully and the conclusion adds new content.

Progression is generally logical with appropriate paragraphing and a range of cohesive devices, but the conclusion functions as an additional argument rather than a summary, and some linking is mechanical.

Vocabulary is flexible and precise, with natural collocations such as 'head start', 'natural talents' and 'cultivate their own skills', though a few phrases show slight formality overload.

A wide range of complex structures is used with flexibility and accuracy, including comparatives and conditionals, with only occasional minor errors that do not impede meaning.

The essay covers both views thoroughly, states a clear and consistent opinion from the outset, and develops each main idea with relevant illustration and explanation.

Ideas progress logically across well-structured paragraphs with skillful use of cohesive devices and clear referencing throughout.

Vocabulary is wide, natural, and precise, with idiomatic phrasing such as 'long-term boon' and 'developmental stages' used flexibly and accurately.

A wide range of grammatical structures, including complex conditionals and concessive clauses, is used with flexibility and only rare, minor slips.